Smt. Lalitha. vs Sri. Kalaiah H.R. — 184/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KACM410001872023

Case disposed

Filing Number

184/2023

Filing Date

25-05-2023

Registration No

184/2023

Registration Date

25-05-2023

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,MUDIGERE

Judge

1217-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Smt. Lalitha.

Adv. Sri. H.R. Chandru.

Smt. Prathima.

Sri. Praveena.

Kum. Pallavi.

Respondent(s)

Sri. Kalaiah H.R.

The Branch Manager, M/s Future Gen. India Ins. Co. Ltd. Near KSRTC Bus Stand, Mudigere.

Hearing History

Judge: 1217-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDIGERE

06-03-2026

Disposed

02-03-2026

JUDGMENTS

23-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

09-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

19-01-2026

EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026

Judgment

Interim Orders

01-03-2024
Issue
10-11-2025
Deposition
10-11-2025
Deposition
10-11-2025
Deposition
09-02-2026
Deposition

The court examined a case involving an auto-rickshaw (KA.18/C.1583) and found that while the vehicle's registration was renewed on 10.04.2023 and is valid until 09.04.2028, it lacked a valid permit on 09.12.2022 when the incident occurred. The RTO (Regional Transport Officer) testified that permits for such vehicles are limited to a 20 km radius, and operating beyond this range requires additional authorization, which the vehicle did not possess. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court examined a case involving an auto-rickshaw (KA.18/C.1583) and found that while the vehicle's registration was renewed on 10.04.2023 and is valid until 09.04.2028, it lacked a valid permit on 09.12.2022 when the incident occurred. The RTO (Regional Transport Officer) testified that permits for such vehicles are limited to a 20 km radius, and operating beyond this range requires additional authorization, which the vehicle did not possess. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,MUDIGERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case