H2.1.Mohammadhusain s/o.Ameerhamja Nalaband vs The SLAO, BTDA, Bagalkot Advocate - PRABHAKAR SANGAPPA DADDENAVAR — 2148/2021

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 64(1). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 23-Mar-2026

L.A.C. - Land Acquisition Cases

CNR: KABK010033952021

Filing Number

2148/2021

Filing Date

05-Jul-2021

Registration No

2148/2021

Registration Date

05-Jul-2021

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT

Judge

1567-V Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

Last updated 20-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 64(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.H2.1.Mohammadhusain s/o.Ameerhamja Nalaband

    Adv. S.S REVADIGAR

  2. 2.H2.2.Abdulajeej s/o.Mohammadhasim Nalaband

    Adv. S.S.REVADIGAR

  3. 3.H1.1.Sohebi d/o.Abdulkhadar Nalaband

    Adv. S.S.REVADIGAR

  4. 4.H1.2.Abdulkalik s/o.Mohammadrahuf Nalaband

    Adv. S.S.REVADIGAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The SLAO, BTDA, Bagalkot Advocate - PRABHAKAR SANGAPPA DADDENAVAR

  2. 2.The State of Karnataka R/by The Deputy Comissioner, Bagalkot

    Adv. SHANKRANNA LAXMANRAO KORA

Case History

  1. 23-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    V Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  3. 21-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    V Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  4. 12-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    V Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  5. 04-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary In LAC No. 2148/2021, the court heard arguments from all parties regarding compensation for a shop/property. The court found that the claimant's arguments regarding property damage and inadequate compensation had merit, and rejected the respondents' contentions. The petition was allowed with directions for enhanced compensation to be assessed based on proper valuation of the property, with the case adjourned for further proceedings on compensation calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 04-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    V Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  7. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    V Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  8. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    V Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  9. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    V Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  10. 06-Sep-2025

    Objections

    V Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  11. 28-Aug-2025

    Objections

    V Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  12. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    V Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  13. 12-Aug-2025

    Objections

    V Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  14. 09-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  15. 28-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  16. 18-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  17. 15-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  18. 21-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  19. 22-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  20. 04-Jan-2022

    Appearance Of Party

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  21. 13-Jul-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 05-Jul-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2148/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In LAC No. 2148/2021, the court heard arguments from all parties regarding compensation for a shop/property. The court found that the claimant's arguments regarding property damage and inadequate compensation had merit, and rejected the respondents' contentions. The petition was allowed with directions for enhanced compensation to be assessed based on proper valuation of the property, with the case adjourned for further proceedings on compensation calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case