M/S RESERVE BANK OF INDIA STAFF AND OTHERS CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD vs GANESH SHANBHOGUE Advocate - SMR — 207/2019

Case under U/o Vii Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.

Com.O.S. - Commercial Original Suit

CNR: KABC170078692020

ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

24th March 2026

Filing Number

207/2019

Filing Date

26-07-2019

Registration No

207/2019

Registration Date

26-07-2019

Court

COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU

Judge

1389-CCH-83 LXXXII ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Acts & Sections

U/o Vii Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc

Petitioner(s)

M/S RESERVE BANK OF INDIA STAFF AND OTHERS CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD

Adv. NATARAJ R

Respondent(s)

GANESH SHANBHOGUE Advocate - SMR

Hearing History

Judge: 1389-CCH-83 LXXXII ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

12-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

06-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

23-02-2026

ORDERS

05-02-2026

ORDERS

20-01-2026

ORDERS

Interim Orders

10-03-2022
Orders
02-09-2022
Issue
14-09-2022
Deposition
23-09-2022
Issue
14-12-2022
Deposition
14-12-2022
Deposition
14-12-2022
Deposition
14-12-2022
Deposition
04-11-2023
Exhibits
23-11-2023
Deposition
23-11-2023
Deposition
23-11-2023
Deposition
15-12-2023
Exhibits
15-12-2023
Deposition
10-01-2024
Deposition
15-02-2024
Deposition
14-03-2024
Deposition
09-09-2024
Deposition
24-09-2024
Deposition
06-11-2024
Deposition
06-11-2024
Deposition
08-11-2024
Deposition
02-12-2024
Deposition
02-12-2024
Deposition
02-12-2024
Deposition
09-01-2025
Exhibits
09-07-2025
Orders
05-08-2025
Deposition
13-08-2025
Deposition
06-03-2026
Orders

Summary: The court dismissed all four interim applications (I.A. Nos. 14, 15, 16, and 17) filed by both the defendant and plaintiff, finding they were attempts to delay proceedings without valid grounds. The defendant's applications to reopen and lead further evidence were rejected due to lack of witness list and unexplained absence, while the plaintiff's applications to mark an overlooked termination letter were dismissed as belated after a lengthy examination period. The case is scheduled for arguments on 12.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court dismissed all four interim applications (I.A. Nos. 14, 15, 16, and 17) filed by both the defendant and plaintiff, finding they were attempts to delay proceedings without valid grounds. The defendant's applications to reopen and lead further evidence were rejected due to lack of witness list and unexplained absence, while the plaintiff's applications to mark an overlooked termination letter were dismissed as belated after a lengthy examination period. The case is scheduled for arguments on 12.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case