M/S ROYALOAK INFRASTRUCTURE LLP vs PORKODI Advocate - Vishwanath Reddy M — 1513/2024
Case under U/o Vii Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
Com.O.S. - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: KABC170029572024
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
Filing Number
1515/2024
Filing Date
12-11-2024
Registration No
1513/2024
Registration Date
12-11-2024
Court
COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU
Judge
1389-CCH-83 LXXXII ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S ROYALOAK INFRASTRUCTURE LLP
Adv. K R BHARADWAJ
Respondent(s)
PORKODI Advocate - Vishwanath Reddy M
Hearing History
Judge: 1389-CCH-83 LXXXII ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 02-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 25-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a cross-examination transcript (not a final order) in a commercial suit (COM.O.S. No. 1513/2024) involving a property lease dispute in Bengaluru. The defendant-witness testified on 18.03.2026 regarding a 9-year lease agreement for Rs.1,50,000/month with Rs.9,00,000 security deposit, denying allegations that she failed to handover possession after completing work in 2023 and claiming she was coerced into signing a settlement MOU requiring repayment of Rs.87,00,000 with interest. No final judgment or order has been issued in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a cross-examination transcript (not a final order) in a commercial suit (COM.O.S. No. 1513/2024) involving a property lease dispute in Bengaluru. The defendant-witness testified on 18.03.2026 regarding a 9-year lease agreement for Rs.1,50,000/month with Rs.9,00,000 security deposit, denying allegations that she failed to handover possession after completing work in 2023 and claiming she was coerced into signing a settlement MOU requiring repayment of Rs.87,00,000 with interest. No final judgment or order has been issued in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts