GOODRICH PROPERTIES vs NANASU MAHILA SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITA Advocate - T M VEERENDRA KUMAR — 1243/2023
Case under U/s 26 and Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
Com.O.S. - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: KABC170026532023
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
1270/2023
Filing Date
04-11-2023
Registration No
1243/2023
Registration Date
04-11-2023
Court
COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU
Judge
1390-CCH-84 LXXXIII ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOODRICH PROPERTIES
Adv. M G RAGHAVENDRA
Respondent(s)
NANASU MAHILA SAHAKARA SANGHA NIYAMITA Advocate - T M VEERENDRA KUMAR
NAGAMANI
Adv. T M VEERENDRA KUMAR
MANJUNATH
Hearing History
Judge: 1390-CCH-84 LXXXIII ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 20-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 10-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 03-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
This document records cross-examination testimony of witness Smt. Nagamani (DW-1) in a civil case (Com.O.S.1243/2023) before the Additional City Civil & Sessions Court, Bengaluru on 10.02.2026. The witness, representing Defendant No.1 Society, was cross-examined by plaintiff's counsel regarding disputed cheques, bank accounts, and financial transactions allegedly totaling Rs.80,00,000, with the witness denying the plaintiff's claims of online transfers and asserting lack of supporting documentation. No final order or judgment was issued in this excerpt—it reflects only the examination proceedings as the case continues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records cross-examination testimony of witness Smt. Nagamani (DW-1) in a civil case (Com.O.S.1243/2023) before the Additional City Civil & Sessions Court, Bengaluru on 10.02.2026. The witness, representing Defendant No.1 Society, was cross-examined by plaintiff's counsel regarding disputed cheques, bank accounts, and financial transactions allegedly totaling Rs.80,00,000, with the witness denying the plaintiff's claims of online transfers and asserting lack of supporting documentation. No final order or judgment was issued in this excerpt—it reflects only the examination proceedings as the case continues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts