SOBHA PROJECTS AND TRADE PRIVATE LIMITED vs G R NATARAJ H U F — 1298/2022
Case under U/s 26 and Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
Com.O.S. - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: KABC170024082022
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
1298/2022
Filing Date
09-09-2022
Registration No
1298/2022
Registration Date
09-09-2022
Court
COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU
Judge
1390-CCH-84 LXXXIII ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SOBHA PROJECTS AND TRADE PRIVATE LIMITED
Adv. K.S.HARISH
Respondent(s)
G R NATARAJ H U F
NATARAJ G R
Adv. Kiran B.C
PRIDE AND EXPERT PROPERTIES PVT LTD
TANVI ASSET HOLDINGS LLP
Hearing History
Judge: 1390-CCH-84 LXXXIII ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 07-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 12-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 31-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
This is a civil suit proceeding (Com.O.S.1298/2022) where witness DW-4 (Defendant's Witness) testified on 31.10.2025 regarding a property dispute involving an HUF (Hindu Undivided Family), a GPA dated 19-05-2012, and defendants D1-D4. The defendant's witness was examined-in-chief and cross-examined by the plaintiff's counsel, with the witness seeking dismissal of the suit while disputing claims about agreement cancellation and payment obligations. The court deferred cross-examination by D3 and D4's counsel to a later date, allowing the plaintiff to cross-examine first by mutual consent, with the case continuing in trial stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a civil suit proceeding (Com.O.S.1298/2022) where witness DW-4 (Defendant's Witness) testified on 31.10.2025 regarding a property dispute involving an HUF (Hindu Undivided Family), a GPA dated 19-05-2012, and defendants D1-D4. The defendant's witness was examined-in-chief and cross-examined by the plaintiff's counsel, with the witness seeking dismissal of the suit while disputing claims about agreement cancellation and payment obligations. The court deferred cross-examination by D3 and D4's counsel to a later date, allowing the plaintiff to cross-examine first by mutual consent, with the case continuing in trial stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts