KIRAN KUMAR A vs LAKSHMANAGUPTA B — 1442/2014
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 and R/w Sec 26 of Cpc Section 0. Status: JUDGMENTS. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
Com.O.S. - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: KABC170008732022
Next Hearing
04th April 2026
Filing Number
1442/2014
Filing Date
19-02-2014
Registration No
1442/2014
Registration Date
19-02-2014
Court
COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU
Judge
1389-CCH-83 LXXXII ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KIRAN KUMAR A
Adv. VENKATESH R
KAMBOJI MALLIKARJUNA
Respondent(s)
LAKSHMANAGUPTA B
SREENIVAS. B.L.
SUSHMA.B.L.
KRISHNA MURTHY.B
ABINAND.B.K.
KARTHIK.B.K
SRIDHAR MURTHY.B
SHRUTHI.B.S.
MS SAMPURNA BUILDERS
E.S.INDIRESH,
SRI. RAMESH OSTWAL
SRI. CHETAN KUMAR JEETMAL JAIN.
SMT SEJAL JAIN.
SRI. VIJAY KUMAR, N. JAIN
Hearing History
Judge: 1389-CCH-83 LXXXII ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
JUDGMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 03-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 23-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 16-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
This document is a court hearing transcript recording witness examination and cross-examination in a civil suit (COM.O.S.No. 1442/2014) before the Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge in Bengaluru on 16.02.2026. The witness testified regarding IT return documents and loan transactions with the plaintiff, denying suggestions that evidence was withheld or that the case was being prolonged. No final order, judgment, or case outcome is declared in this excerpt—it is merely a procedural record of witness testimony during the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a court hearing transcript recording witness examination and cross-examination in a civil suit (COM.O.S.No. 1442/2014) before the Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge in Bengaluru on 16.02.2026. The witness testified regarding IT return documents and loan transactions with the plaintiff, denying suggestions that evidence was withheld or that the case was being prolonged. No final order, judgment, or case outcome is declared in this excerpt—it is merely a procedural record of witness testimony during the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts