MOHAN K G vs RENUKA VINOD KUMAR GANDHI Advocate - L Ashok Kumar — 165/2025
Case under U/s 26 and Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Com.O.S. - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: KABC170005022025
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
e-Filing Number
03-02-2025
Filing Number
164/2025
Filing Date
03-02-2025
Registration No
165/2025
Registration Date
03-02-2025
Court
COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU
Judge
1389-CCH-83 LXXXII ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHAN K G
Adv. SRINIVASA GOWDA Y V
Respondent(s)
RENUKA VINOD KUMAR GANDHI Advocate - L Ashok Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1389-CCH-83 LXXXII ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
ARGUMENTS
A.D.R.
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | A.D.R. |
| 02-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
This document records the cross-examination of a defendant witness (DW-1) in a commercial suit (COM.O.S. No. 165/2025) before the LXXXII Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge in Bengaluru on 06.03.2026. The witness, representing the defendant (Minto Clothing), was cross-examined regarding disputed goods supplied by plaintiff Vaishnavi Labels and Accessories, with the plaintiff's advocate challenging the witness's claims about non-payment of Rs. 4,65,194/-. No final order or judgment was issued in this document; it merely records the witness examination testimony, with no re-examination conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the cross-examination of a defendant witness (DW-1) in a commercial suit (COM.O.S. No. 165/2025) before the LXXXII Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge in Bengaluru on 06.03.2026. The witness, representing the defendant (Minto Clothing), was cross-examined regarding disputed goods supplied by plaintiff Vaishnavi Labels and Accessories, with the plaintiff's advocate challenging the witness's claims about non-payment of Rs. 4,65,194/-. No final order or judgment was issued in this document; it merely records the witness examination testimony, with no re-examination conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts