SIDDRATH ALIAS SIDDH VINAYSING vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - C G PATEL — 86/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJVD200001982026

Filing Number

86/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

86/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

ADDL. COURT-SAVLI

Judge

2-9th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SIDDRATH ALIAS SIDDH VINAYSING

    Adv. R A PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - C G PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted regular bail to 19-year-old Siddrath alias Siddhu Vinaysing in a case involving charges under Sections 309(4), 142, 351(3), and 54 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that after four months of judicial custody, no further custodial interrogation was needed, the chargesheet was filed, and co-accused had already been released on bail. The court rejected the prosecution's mere apprehension about flight risk, finding that suitable bail conditions could address such concerns. The accused was released on Rs. 10,000 cash surety and Rs. 15,000 personal bond with conditions including monthly police station reporting, passport surrender, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    9th Addl District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 86/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted regular bail to 19-year-old Siddrath alias Siddhu Vinaysing in a case involving charges under Sections 309(4), 142, 351(3), and 54 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that after four months of judicial custody, no further custodial interrogation was needed, the chargesheet was filed, and co-accused had already been released on bail. The court rejected the prosecution's mere apprehension about flight risk, finding that suitable bail conditions could address such concerns. The accused was released on Rs. 10,000 cash surety and Rs. 15,000 personal bond with conditions including monthly police station reporting, passport surrender, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case