LATE ISHARIBEN KATAKIYABHAI DASHRIYABHAI GAMITS DAUGHTER(Legal Heir) vs RAMSINGBHAI BAVABHAI GAMIT Advocate - S M GAMIT — 6/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 38,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJTP050003382025
Next Hearing
18th March 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
6/2025
Filing Date
29-03-2025
Registration No
6/2025
Registration Date
29-03-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, UCHCHHAL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LATE ISHARIBEN KATAKIYABHAI DASHRIYABHAI GAMITS DAUGHTER(Legal Heir)
Adv. C D KHAIRE1.
ARJUNBHAI POSALIYABHAI GAMIT
BABLIMARD RAVAJIBHAI GAMITS WIFE
Respondent(s)
RAMSINGBHAI BAVABHAI GAMIT Advocate - S M GAMIT
RAKESHBHAI RAMSINGBHAI GAMIT
VIRUBEN RAMSINGBHAI BAVABHAIS WIFE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
FOR COUNTER AFFIDAVIT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 09-02-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 30-01-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 12-01-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 18-12-2025 | FOR COUNTER AFFIDAVIT |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The court granted the plaintiffs' petition for mandatory injunction. The court ordered that defendants must not interfere with the plaintiffs' agricultural activities on their respective land shares and must allow plaintiffs exclusive possession and cultivation rights pending final disposal of the case. The court also directed that costs of the interim relief be borne by the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court granted the plaintiffs' petition for mandatory injunction. The court ordered that defendants must not interfere with the plaintiffs' agricultural activities on their respective land shares and must allow plaintiffs exclusive possession and cultivation rights pending final disposal of the case. The court also directed that costs of the interim relief be borne by the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts