JASHODABEN WIDOW OF SATISHBHAI SHANKARBHAI CHAUDHRI vs NARMADABEN WIDOW OF BABUBHAI SHANKARBHAI CHAUDHRI Advocate - S V PRADHAN — 12/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 30-Apr-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJTP030017202024

Filing Number

12/2024

Filing Date

08-Aug-2024

Registration No

12/2024

Registration Date

08-Aug-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, VALOD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JASHODABEN WIDOW OF SATISHBHAI SHANKARBHAI CHAUDHRI

    Adv. G U VYAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NARMADABEN WIDOW OF BABUBHAI SHANKARBHAI CHAUDHRI Advocate - S V PRADHAN

  2. 2.NILKANTHKUMAR BABUBHAI CHAUDHRI

  3. 3.RAHULKUMAR BABUBHAI CHAUDHRI

Case History

  1. 30-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Order Summary The Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Valod granted a temporary/interim injunction in favor of the plaintiff under CPC Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 and Section 151. The court restrained the defendants from selling, transferring, assigning, mortgaging, or otherwise disposing of the disputed properties until final disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiff had established a prima facie case and balance of convenience favored granting the injunction to prevent irreparable injury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 13-Jan-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 15-Dec-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 20-Nov-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 07-Nov-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 08-Oct-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 18-Sep-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 07-Aug-2025

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 19-Jul-2025

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 20-Jun-2025

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 12-May-2025

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 18-Apr-2025

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 20-Mar-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 06-Mar-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 06-Feb-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 18-Jan-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 26-Dec-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 21-Nov-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 17-Oct-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 19-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 08-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary The Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Valod granted a temporary/interim injunction in favor of the plaintiff under CPC Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 and Section 151. The court restrained the defendants from selling, transferring, assigning, mortgaging, or otherwise disposing of the disputed properties until final disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiff had established a prima facie case and balance of convenience favored granting the injunction to prevent irreparable injury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case