JASHODABEN WIDOW OF SATISHBHAI SHANKARBHAI CHAUDHRI vs NARMADABEN WIDOW OF BABUBHAI SHANKARBHAI CHAUDHRI Advocate - S V PRADHAN — 12/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJTP030017202024

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

30th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

12/2024

Filing Date

08-08-2024

Registration No

12/2024

Registration Date

08-08-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, VALOD

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Acts & Sections

SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

JASHODABEN WIDOW OF SATISHBHAI SHANKARBHAI CHAUDHRI

Adv. G U VYAS

Respondent(s)

NARMADABEN WIDOW OF BABUBHAI SHANKARBHAI CHAUDHRI Advocate - S V PRADHAN

NILKANTHKUMAR BABUBHAI CHAUDHRI

RAHULKUMAR BABUBHAI CHAUDHRI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

01-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

09-03-2026

ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION

26-02-2026

ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION

31-01-2026

ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION

13-01-2026

ORDER ON INJUCTION APPLICATION

Interim Orders

01-04-2026
ORDER

Court Order Summary The Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Valod granted a temporary/interim injunction in favor of the plaintiff under CPC Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 and Section 151. The court restrained the defendants from selling, transferring, assigning, mortgaging, or otherwise disposing of the disputed properties until final disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiff had established a prima facie case and balance of convenience favored granting the injunction to prevent irreparable injury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary The Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Valod granted a temporary/interim injunction in favor of the plaintiff under CPC Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 and Section 151. The court restrained the defendants from selling, transferring, assigning, mortgaging, or otherwise disposing of the disputed properties until final disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiff had established a prima facie case and balance of convenience favored granting the injunction to prevent irreparable injury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VALOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case