DIPTIKABEN JITINBHAI BHAKT NA KUL MUKHTYAR PRITESHKUMAR RASIKBHAI BHAKT vs INDUBEN DHIRUBHAI BHAKT Advocate - D R DHIMAR — 22/2015
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 034,038. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJTP020001842015
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
22/2015
Filing Date
14-12-2010
Registration No
22/2015
Registration Date
14-12-2010
Court
CIVIL COURT, VYARA
Judge
2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DIPTIKABEN JITINBHAI BHAKT NA KUL MUKHTYAR PRITESHKUMAR RASIKBHAI BHAKT
Adv. N M PATEL, M M PANCHAL
Respondent(s)
INDUBEN DHIRUBHAI BHAKT Advocate - D R DHIMAR
LALJIBHAI VELJIBHAI SAVANI
Adv. V K RUPAVATIA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 07-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 27-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 18-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 09-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected the defendants' application with no cost orders. The plaintiff was given the option to either examine himself first or continue with his power of attorney holder's examination. However, if the plaintiff chooses to proceed with the power of attorney holder's testimony, he will be precluded from examining himself personally as either the plaintiff or a witness in the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the defendants' application with no cost orders. The plaintiff was given the option to either examine himself first or continue with his power of attorney holder's examination. However, if the plaintiff chooses to proceed with the power of attorney holder's testimony, he will be precluded from examining himself personally as either the plaintiff or a witness in the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts