AMITBHAI HASMUKHBHAI ADATIYA vs MANOJKUMAR SOHANLAL AGRAWAL Advocate - S S AMRE — 43/2024

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJTP010007902024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

43/2024

Filing Date

04-10-2024

Registration No

43/2024

Registration Date

04-10-2024

Court

DISTRICT COURT, TAPI

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 415,
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

AMITBHAI HASMUKHBHAI ADATIYA

Adv. N L AMBALIA

Respondent(s)

MANOJKUMAR SOHANLAL AGRAWAL Advocate - S S AMRE

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

16-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

28-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

18-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

13-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court dismissed the appellant's criminal appeal against conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 (cheque dishonour). The court held that once cheque execution is admitted, statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the NI Act automatically arise; the appellant failed to rebut these presumptions with credible evidence, and the trial court's conviction was legally sound and based on proper application of law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dismissed the appellant's criminal appeal against conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 (cheque dishonour). The court held that once cheque execution is admitted, statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the NI Act automatically arise; the appellant failed to rebut these presumptions with credible evidence, and the trial court's conviction was legally sound and based on proper application of law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT, TAPI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case