Government of Gujarat vs MOHAMMAD AKSAT MOHAMMAD IMRAN SHAIKH — 1050/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),296(B),351(2),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 25th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR170012312026
Filing Number
1050/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
1050/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Court
MUNICIPAL COURT, Surat
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
116
Police Station
ATHWALINES POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MOHAMMAD AKSAT MOHAMMAD IMRAN SHAIKH
-
2.MO AMAN MO IMRAN SHAIKH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 1050/2026 Court Decision: The court acquitted both defendants (Mohammad Aksat Mohammad Imran Shaikh and Mo Aman Mo Imran Shaikh) of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 115(2), 296(b), 351(2), and 54. The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the alleged assault, abusive language, and threatening behavior during a February 1, 2026 incident involving a traffic collision. Key Reasoning: The sole prosecution witness could not identify the accused and admitted not witnessing key events. Despite charges alleging belt beatings, public obscenities, and death threats, the court found insufficient evidence linking the defendants to these crimes. The defendants were discharged with bail conditions for potential appeal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Muni.)
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1050/2026
Case Summary: 1050/2026 Court Decision: The court acquitted both defendants (Mohammad Aksat Mohammad Imran Shaikh and Mo Aman Mo Imran Shaikh) of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 115(2), 296(b), 351(2), and 54. The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the alleged assault, abusive language, and threatening behavior during a February 1, 2026 incident involving a traffic collision. Key Reasoning: The sole prosecution witness could not identify the accused and admitted not witnessing key events. Despite charges alleging belt beatings, public obscenities, and death threats, the court found insufficient evidence linking the defendants to these crimes. The defendants were discharged with bail conditions for potential appeal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts