Government of Gujarat vs FENIL BHARATBHAI SAVANI(Absconding) — 1416/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65E. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th March 2026.

CC RLY - CRIMINAL CASE - RAILWAY

CNR: GJSR160014722025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1419/2025

Filing Date

09-05-2025

Registration No

1416/2025

Registration Date

09-05-2025

Court

RAILWAY COURT, Surat

Judge

1-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (RAILWAYS)

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

745

Police Station

SURAT RLY.POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

FENIL BHARATBHAI SAVANI(Absconding)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (RAILWAYS)

09-03-2026

Disposed

23-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

02-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

05-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

15-12-2025

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Judgment Summary Case: JMFC(Railways) Surat, CC.1416/2025 Date of Judgment: 09-03-2026 The court acquitted the accused Fenil s/o Bharat Kumar Savani of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for alleged possession of foreign liquor without valid pass/permit. The court found that prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and contradictory evidence, weak witness testimony, lack of independent corroboration, and improper seizure procedures—leading to the conclusion that the charge could not be established conclusively against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Judgment Summary Case: JMFC(Railways) Surat, CC.1416/2025 Date of Judgment: 09-03-2026 The court acquitted the accused Fenil s/o Bharat Kumar Savani of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for alleged possession of foreign liquor without valid pass/permit. The court found that prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and contradictory evidence, weak witness testimony, lack of independent corroboration, and improper seizure procedures—leading to the conclusion that the charge could not be established conclusively against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

RAILWAY COURT, Surat All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case