Government of Gujarat vs GURUCHARAN MADHAVCHAND SHAHU(Absconding) — 2808/2024

Case under Arms Act Section 25(1)(A)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CC RLY - CRIMINAL CASE - RAILWAY

CNR: GJSR160012942022

Filing Number

763/2022

Filing Date

31-Aug-2017

Registration No

2808/2024

Registration Date

31-Aug-2017

Court

RAILWAY COURT, Surat

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

276

Police Station

SURAT RLY.POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

1994

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 25(1)(A)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GURUCHARAN MADHAVCHAND SHAHU(Absconding)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: CC 2808/2024 Court Decision: The Surat Sessions Court acquitted the accused Gurucharan Madhavchand Shahu (absconding) of charges under the Arms Act Section 25(1)(a)(b) due to insufficient evidence and procedural deficiencies. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to produce a ballistics expert report (FSL report) required to establish the prohibited nature of the recovered arms, and no valid sanction from the District Magistrate was obtained before prosecution under Section 39 of the Arms Act, rendering the charges legally unsustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  10. 06-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  11. 09-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  12. 25-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  13. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  14. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  15. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  16. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  17. 02-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  18. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  19. 29-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  20. 15-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  21. 24-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  22. 03-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  23. 13-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  24. 22-Apr-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  25. 01-Apr-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  26. 11-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  27. 25-Feb-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  28. 11-Feb-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  29. 21-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  30. 31-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  31. 04-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  32. 06-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  33. 15-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  34. 07-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  35. 15-May-2024

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  36. 21-Feb-2024

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  37. 29-Nov-2023

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  38. 06-Sep-2023

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  39. 08-Aug-2023

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  40. 15-Jun-2023

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  41. 06-May-2023

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  42. 31-Mar-2023

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  43. 23-Feb-2023

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  44. 11-Jan-2023

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  45. 02-Dec-2022

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  46. 15-Oct-2022

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  47. 07-Sep-2022

    Process To Accused

    Judicial Magistrate First Class (Railways)

  48. 26-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 31-Aug-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2808/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 2808/2024 Court Decision: The Surat Sessions Court acquitted the accused Gurucharan Madhavchand Shahu (absconding) of charges under the Arms Act Section 25(1)(a)(b) due to insufficient evidence and procedural deficiencies. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to produce a ballistics expert report (FSL report) required to establish the prohibited nature of the recovered arms, and no valid sanction from the District Magistrate was obtained before prosecution under Section 39 of the Arms Act, rendering the charges legally unsustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case