GARDEN SILK MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED (NEW NAME) vs SHRI CHHOTUBHAI MOTIRAM Advocate - S T CHAUDHARI — 41/2024
Case under Gujarat Industrial Relation Act, 1946 Section 84(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 22nd May 2026.
MISCAPP-IC - MISC. APPLICATION (I.C.)
CNR: GJSR130001412024
Filing Number
41/2024
Filing Date
25-10-2024
Registration No
41/2024
Registration Date
25-10-2024
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, SURAT
Judge
2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Decision Date
22nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GARDEN SILK MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED (NEW NAME)
Adv. J.D.Chalishajar
Respondent(s)
SHRI CHHOTUBHAI MOTIRAM Advocate - S T CHAUDHARI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
REPLY
REPLY
REPLY
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 07-05-2026 | REPLY |
| 01-05-2026 | REPLY |
| 10-04-2026 | REPLY |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Misc. Appli. (I.C.) No. 41/2024 The Industrial Court of Surat granted Garden Silk Mills Private Limited's application to condone a delay of 3 months and 7 days in filing an appeal under Section 84(2) of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946. The court found the delay was caused by internal administrative reasons and legal consultation, not willful misconduct, and that denying condonement would prevent adjudication on merits. The court ordered the company to pay ₹5,001 to the respondent (worker) as costs within 30 days before the appeal could proceed for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Misc. Appli. (I.C.) No. 41/2024 The Industrial Court of Surat granted Garden Silk Mills Private Limited's application to condone a delay of 3 months and 7 days in filing an appeal under Section 84(2) of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946. The court found the delay was caused by internal administrative reasons and legal consultation, not willful misconduct, and that denying condonement would prevent adjudication on merits. The court ordered the company to pay ₹5,001 to the respondent (worker) as costs within 30 days before the appeal could proceed for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts