STATE OF GUJARAT vs SHRAVANSING PRABHUSING RAVAT Advocate - R C VASAVA — 35/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 380,457,144,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR100000412025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
35/2025
Filing Date
30-01-2025
Registration No
35/2025
Registration Date
30-01-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, UMARPADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
202
Police Station
UMARPADA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SHRAVANSING PRABHUSING RAVAT Advocate - R C VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 09-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 21-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 05-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted both accused in criminal cases (FIR No. 316/2024 and 35/2025) of charges under IPC Sections 380, 457, 114, and Motor Vehicle Act Section 135 for an alleged ₹3.8 lakh cash theft from a petrol pump, finding the prosecution's evidence—consisting solely of confessions made to police during investigation—inadmissible under Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act and insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted both accused in criminal cases (FIR No. 316/2024 and 35/2025) of charges under IPC Sections 380, 457, 114, and Motor Vehicle Act Section 135 for an alleged ₹3.8 lakh cash theft from a petrol pump, finding the prosecution's evidence—consisting solely of confessions made to police during investigation—inadmissible under Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act and insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts