STATE OF GUJARAT vs SHRAVANSING PRABHUSING RAVAT Advocate - R C VASAVA — 35/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 380,457,144. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR100000412025

Filing Number

35/2025

Filing Date

30-Jan-2025

Registration No

35/2025

Registration Date

30-Jan-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, UMARPADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

202

Police Station

UMARPADA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 380,457,144
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRAVANSING PRABHUSING RAVAT Advocate - R C VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted both accused in criminal cases (FIR No. 316/2024 and 35/2025) of charges under IPC Sections 380, 457, 114, and Motor Vehicle Act Section 135 for an alleged ₹3.8 lakh cash theft from a petrol pump, finding the prosecution's evidence—consisting solely of confessions made to police during investigation—inadmissible under Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act and insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 06-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 11-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 17-May-2025

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 19-Apr-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 15-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 28-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 30-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 35/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Decision The court acquitted both accused in criminal cases (FIR No. 316/2024 and 35/2025) of charges under IPC Sections 380, 457, 114, and Motor Vehicle Act Section 135 for an alleged ₹3.8 lakh cash theft from a petrol pump, finding the prosecution's evidence—consisting solely of confessions made to police during investigation—inadmissible under Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act and insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case