Government of Gujarat vs PANDHERINATH HIRAMAN BADE Advocate - C B DESAI — 1374/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,304A. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR090016632024
Filing Number
1374/2024
Filing Date
11-Jun-2024
Registration No
1374/2024
Registration Date
11-Jun-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, PALSANA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214023240036
Police Station
KADODARA GIDC POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.PANDHERINATH HIRAMAN BADE Advocate - C B DESAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 1374/2024 Court Decision: The accused, Pandherinath Hiraman Bade, was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 304(a) and MV Act Sections 177, 184. The court found insufficient evidence of rash or negligent driving causing the death of a pedestrian in a road accident on January 8, 2024. Key Reasoning: While the death was confirmed through post-mortem and investigation reports, the prosecution failed to establish that the accused's driving was rash or negligent. No eyewitness directly observed the accused driving recklessly; all witnesses learned of the accident secondhand. The bus conductor testified the vehicle's speed was normal and the driver showed no negligence. Without proving criminal rashness beyond mere carelessness, the charges could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Aug-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jun-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-May-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Feb-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jan-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Dec-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Oct-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Aug-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1374/2024
Case Summary: 1374/2024 Court Decision: The accused, Pandherinath Hiraman Bade, was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 304(a) and MV Act Sections 177, 184. The court found insufficient evidence of rash or negligent driving causing the death of a pedestrian in a road accident on January 8, 2024. Key Reasoning: While the death was confirmed through post-mortem and investigation reports, the prosecution failed to establish that the accused's driving was rash or negligent. No eyewitness directly observed the accused driving recklessly; all witnesses learned of the accident secondhand. The bus conductor testified the vehicle's speed was normal and the driver showed no negligence. Without proving criminal rashness beyond mere carelessness, the charges could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts