A.R.Valvi,food Inspecter vs Gomanbhai Ranchodbhai Patel — 747/2002

Case under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Section 2. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR050001262002

Filing Number

747/2002

Filing Date

03-Apr-2002

Registration No

747/2002

Registration Date

03-Apr-2002

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANGROL

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A.R.Valvi,food Inspecter

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gomanbhai Ranchodbhai Patel

  2. 2.Ramprakash Mataprsad Gupta

  3. 3.Vishnu And Company Pra.Li.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 747/2002 Court Decision: The court acquitted accused Ramprakash Mataprasad Gupta (food vendor) under PFA Act 1954 for selling substandard Vimal Gutka. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant (Food Inspector A.R. Valvi) did not produce independent witness statements or provide complete analysis methodology details required under food safety regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 17-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 02-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 23-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 10-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 24-Nov-2025

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 27-Oct-2025

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 07-Oct-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 11-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 20-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 30-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 19-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  20. 12-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  21. 09-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  22. 25-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Additional Senior CIVIL Judge & CJM

  23. 23-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 09-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 04-Apr-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 10-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 20-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 25-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 27-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 28-May-2024

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 28-Feb-2024

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 30-Nov-2023

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 01-Sep-2023

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 03-Jun-2023

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 06-Mar-2023

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 06-Dec-2022

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 07-Sep-2022

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 09-Jun-2022

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 11-Mar-2022

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 13-Dec-2021

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 20-Sep-2021

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 21-Jun-2021

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 23-Mar-2021

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 23-Dec-2020

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 24-Sep-2020

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  46. 26-Jun-2020

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  47. 30-Mar-2020

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  48. 31-Dec-2019

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  49. 30-Sep-2019

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  50. 27-Jun-2019

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  51. 08-Sep-2018

    Process To Accused ( Dormant Case )

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  52. 23-Aug-2018

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  53. 07-Aug-2018

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  54. 31-Jul-2018

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  55. 25-Jul-2018

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  56. 27-Jun-2018

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  57. 20-Jun-2018

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  58. 13-Jun-2018

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  59. 06-Jun-2018

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  60. 30-May-2018

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  61. 16-May-2018

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  62. 09-May-2018

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  63. 01-May-2018

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  64. 24-Apr-2018

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  65. 12-Feb-2018

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  66. 22-Jan-2018

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  67. 13-Dec-2017

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  68. 10-Oct-2017

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  69. 08-Aug-2017

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  70. 10-May-2017

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  71. 02-Mar-2017

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  72. 03-Dec-2016

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  73. 15-Sep-2016

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  74. 23-Jun-2016

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  75. 01-Apr-2016

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  76. 11-Feb-2016

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  77. 26-Nov-2015

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  78. 08-Sep-2015

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  79. 17-Jul-2014

    Process To Accused

  80. 19-Apr-2014

    Process To Accused

  81. 13-Feb-2014

    Process To Accused

  82. 07-Dec-2013

    Process To Accused

  83. 27-Sep-2013

    Process To Accused

  84. 17-Jan-2013

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  85. 03-Apr-2002

    Case filed

    Registration No. 747/2002

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 747/2002 Court Decision: The court acquitted accused Ramprakash Mataprasad Gupta (food vendor) under PFA Act 1954 for selling substandard Vimal Gutka. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant (Food Inspector A.R. Valvi) did not produce independent witness statements or provide complete analysis methodology details required under food safety regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case