AIYUBKHAN LALKHAN PATHAN vs Government of Gujarat — 1670/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010030052026

Filing Number

1671/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

1670/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

8-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

314

Police Station

SURAT RLY.POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E),116(B),81

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AIYUBKHAN LALKHAN PATHAN

    Adv. D C SHAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Surat rejected the bail application of Aiyubkhan Lalkhan Pathan under Section 482 BNS, 2023. The court found that the accused was involved in smuggling foreign liquor through railway premises along with other co-accused, and custodial interrogation was necessary to uncover the source and distribution network of contraband materials. The court concluded that releasing the accused on bail would risk continuation of criminal activities and obstruction of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1670/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Surat rejected the bail application of Aiyubkhan Lalkhan Pathan under Section 482 BNS, 2023. The court found that the accused was involved in smuggling foreign liquor through railway premises along with other co-accused, and custodial interrogation was necessary to uncover the source and distribution network of contraband materials. The court concluded that releasing the accused on bail would risk continuation of criminal activities and obstruction of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case