AIYUBKHAN LALKHAN PATHAN vs Government of Gujarat — 1670/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010030052026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1671/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

1670/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

314

Police Station

SURAT RLY.POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 482,
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(E),116(B),81,

Petitioner(s)

AIYUBKHAN LALKHAN PATHAN

Adv. D C SHAH

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat

Hearing History

Judge: 8-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

11-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

ORDER

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Surat rejected the bail application of Aiyubkhan Lalkhan Pathan under Section 482 BNS, 2023. The court found that the accused was involved in smuggling foreign liquor through railway premises along with other co-accused, and custodial interrogation was necessary to uncover the source and distribution network of contraband materials. The court concluded that releasing the accused on bail would risk continuation of criminal activities and obstruction of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Surat rejected the bail application of Aiyubkhan Lalkhan Pathan under Section 482 BNS, 2023. The court found that the accused was involved in smuggling foreign liquor through railway premises along with other co-accused, and custodial interrogation was necessary to uncover the source and distribution network of contraband materials. The court concluded that releasing the accused on bail would risk continuation of criminal activities and obstruction of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case