SAHID SHABBIR GODIL vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - N L SUKHADWALA — 1426/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJSR010025962026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1427/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

1426/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 309(6),351(3),352,61(2),3(5),
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135,
THE GUJARAT CONTROL OF TERRORISM AND ORGANISED CRIME ACT, 2015 Section 3(1),3(2),3(4),

Petitioner(s)

SAHID SHABBIR GODIL

Adv. K P RESHAMWALA

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - N L SUKHADWALA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

13-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

ORDER

06-03-2026

HEARING

02-03-2026

HEARING

27-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court at Surat denied bail to applicant Shahid Shabbir Gondil under the Gujarat Control of Organized Crime Act, 2015 (GJSOCA). The court found prima facie evidence that Gondil was an active member of an organized crime syndicate called "Sakham Gondil Gang" involved in violent crimes including extortion, assault, robbery, and intimidation. Applying Section 20(4) of GJSOCA, which requires "reasonable grounds" to believe the accused is innocent, the court determined the charge-sheet and investigation findings established sufficient grounds to reject bail pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court at Surat denied bail to applicant Shahid Shabbir Gondil under the Gujarat Control of Organized Crime Act, 2015 (GJSOCA). The court found prima facie evidence that Gondil was an active member of an organized crime syndicate called "Sakham Gondil Gang" involved in violent crimes including extortion, assault, robbery, and intimidation. Applying Section 20(4) of GJSOCA, which requires "reasonable grounds" to believe the accused is innocent, the court determined the charge-sheet and investigation findings established sufficient grounds to reject bail pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case