Government of Gujarat vs FAIZAN ALAM ISRAR ALAM SAIYAD Advocate - P V KEDARE — 80/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379(A)(3). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th April 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJSR010013652023
Filing Number
80/2023
Filing Date
27-Jan-2023
Registration No
80/2023
Registration Date
27-Jan-2023
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT SURAT
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11210002216509
Police Station
SACHIN G.I.D.C POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. R P DOBARIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.FAIZAN ALAM ISRAR ALAM SAIYAD Advocate - P V KEDARE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Gujarat District Court acquitted the accused (Faizan Alam Israr Alam Syed, age 21) charged under IPC Section 379(A)(3) for mobile phone theft on April 9, 2026. The court found insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the prosecution failed to establish the accused's identity conclusively, lacked critical evidence like CCTV footage, and relied heavily on a single eyewitness whose testimony contained discrepancies regarding the accused's identification and vehicle registration details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
28-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
11-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
21-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
16-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
13-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
8th Addl District Judge
-
11-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
8th Addl District Judge
-
28-Feb-2025
Documentary Evidence
8th Addl District Judge
-
17-Jan-2025
Documentary Evidence
8th Addl District Judge
-
13-Dec-2024
Documentary Evidence
8th Addl District Judge
-
07-Nov-2024
Documentary Evidence
8th Addl District Judge
-
04-Oct-2024
Documentary Evidence
9th Addl District Judge
-
05-Sep-2024
Documentary Evidence
9th Addl District Judge
-
31-Jul-2024
Documentary Evidence
9th Addl District Judge
-
08-Jul-2024
Documentary Evidence
9th Addl District Judge
-
27-May-2024
Documentary Evidence
12th Addl District Judge
-
12-Feb-2024
Documentary Evidence
9th Addl District Judge
-
23-Oct-2023
Documentary Evidence
9th Addl District Judge
-
19-Jun-2023
Documentary Evidence
9th Addl District Judge
-
06-Mar-2023
Documentary Evidence
9th Addl District Judge
-
13-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 80/2023
Summary The Gujarat District Court acquitted the accused (Faizan Alam Israr Alam Syed, age 21) charged under IPC Section 379(A)(3) for mobile phone theft on April 9, 2026. The court found insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, as the prosecution failed to establish the accused's identity conclusively, lacked critical evidence like CCTV footage, and relied heavily on a single eyewitness whose testimony contained discrepancies regarding the accused's identification and vehicle registration details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts