P. G. V. C. L. SUB DIVISION PATDI vs SURESHBHAI RAMCHANDRA VAISHNAV Advocate - I K MALEK — 209/2023

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 30th April 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJSN120013662023

Filing Number

209/2023

Filing Date

07-Jul-2023

Registration No

209/2023

Registration Date

07-Jul-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, PATDI

Judge

31-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P. G. V. C. L. SUB DIVISION PATDI

    Adv. H H NANDANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SURESHBHAI RAMCHANDRA VAISHNAV Advocate - I K MALEK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: RCS No. 209-2023 The court rejected the plaintiff electricity company's civil suit claiming electricity theft damages from the defendant under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The court held that civil liability in electricity theft cases falls exclusively under Special Court jurisdiction per Section 154(5), and cannot be determined through civil court proceedings. The plaintiff lacked legal standing to file this civil suit without prior criminal conviction and civil liability determination by the Special Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 02-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 28-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 17-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 12-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 14-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 04-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 10-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 28-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 28-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 26-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 22-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 24-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 23-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 30-Apr-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 15-Feb-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 20-Nov-2023

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 26-Oct-2023

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 21-Sep-2023

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 03-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 07-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 209/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 209-2023 The court rejected the plaintiff electricity company's civil suit claiming electricity theft damages from the defendant under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The court held that civil liability in electricity theft cases falls exclusively under Special Court jurisdiction per Section 154(5), and cannot be determined through civil court proceedings. The plaintiff lacked legal standing to file this civil suit without prior criminal conviction and civil liability determination by the Special Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case