State Bank of India Sarla Branch Through Manager Girishbhai Maishurbhai Chavda vs NATHUBHAI MOTIBHAI RATHOD — 41/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2,7,9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 25th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJSN060001052026
Filing Number
41/2026
Filing Date
19-Feb-2026
Registration No
41/2026
Registration Date
19-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, MULI
Judge
27-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Bank of India Sarla Branch Through Manager Girishbhai Maishurbhai Chavda
Adv. D M JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.NATHUBHAI MOTIBHAI RATHOD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
State Bank of India's Sarla Branch recovered a partially successful judgment against respondent Nathubhai Motibhai Rathod for an outstanding agricultural loan debt of ₹1,87,414 with interest. The court awarded the bank ₹1,41,000 principal amount plus simple interest at 6% per annum from the case filing date, finding the respondent had availed the Kisan Credit Card facility, defaulted on repayment despite multiple recovery notices, and the suit was filed within the statutory limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 41/2026
State Bank of India's Sarla Branch recovered a partially successful judgment against respondent Nathubhai Motibhai Rathod for an outstanding agricultural loan debt of ₹1,87,414 with interest. The court awarded the bank ₹1,41,000 principal amount plus simple interest at 6% per annum from the case filing date, finding the respondent had availed the Kisan Credit Card facility, defaulted on repayment despite multiple recovery notices, and the suit was filed within the statutory limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts