P.G.V.C.L. LIMBDI RURAL SUB DIVISION vs RUDATALA POPATBHAI KANJIBHAI SHARDULBHAI MANGABHAI Advocate - N M ZANDADIYA — 379/2024

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 126. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJSN030018432024

Filing Number

379/2024

Filing Date

11-Dec-2024

Registration No

379/2024

Registration Date

11-Dec-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, LIMBDI

Judge

22-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 126

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.G.V.C.L. LIMBDI RURAL SUB DIVISION

    Adv. H N RAVAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RUDATALA POPATBHAI KANJIBHAI SHARDULBHAI MANGABHAI Advocate - N M ZANDADIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: RCS 379/2024 Court Decision: The court ruled in favor of P.G.V.C.L. (Petitioner/Electricity Company) against Rudatala Popatbhai Kanjibhai Shardulbhai Mangabhai (Respondent/Consumer). The court found that the respondent engaged in unauthorized electricity consumption by illegally bypassing the meter and ordered him to pay the outstanding electricity bill of Rs. 1,58,256 plus 6% annual interest, with recovery authorized against his property and possessions. Key Reasoning: The court accepted inspection reports prepared by the company's officials as credible evidence establishing that the respondent had illegally diverted electricity supply, preventing proper meter recording. The respondent failed to substantively rebut these findings or provide documentary proof of innocence. Under Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003, unauthorized electricity use—a civil matter distinct from criminal theft—was established, making the consumer liable for the full unpaid charges with interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 05-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 13-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 17-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 07-Nov-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 27-Oct-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 26-Sep-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 13-Sep-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 02-Sep-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 19-Aug-2025

    Defendant Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 04-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 08-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 27-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 18-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 18-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 20-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 28-Feb-2025

    Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 06-Feb-2025

    Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 17-Jan-2025

    Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 11-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 11-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 379/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 379/2024 Court Decision: The court ruled in favor of P.G.V.C.L. (Petitioner/Electricity Company) against Rudatala Popatbhai Kanjibhai Shardulbhai Mangabhai (Respondent/Consumer). The court found that the respondent engaged in unauthorized electricity consumption by illegally bypassing the meter and ordered him to pay the outstanding electricity bill of Rs. 1,58,256 plus 6% annual interest, with recovery authorized against his property and possessions. Key Reasoning: The court accepted inspection reports prepared by the company's officials as credible evidence establishing that the respondent had illegally diverted electricity supply, preventing proper meter recording. The respondent failed to substantively rebut these findings or provide documentary proof of innocence. Under Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003, unauthorized electricity use—a civil matter distinct from criminal theft—was established, making the consumer liable for the full unpaid charges with interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case