RACHANA PACKGING OWNER GHANSHYAMBHAI DEVUBHAI TAMALIYA vs RIZVANBHAI RAZAKBHAI MEMON — 2286/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 06th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSN020030752024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2286/2024
Filing Date
20-07-2024
Registration No
2286/2024
Registration Date
20-07-2024
Court
CIVIL COURT SURENDRANAGAR
Judge
4-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RACHANA PACKGING OWNER GHANSHYAMBHAI DEVUBHAI TAMALIYA
Adv. V S JANI
Respondent(s)
RIZVANBHAI RAZAKBHAI MEMON
Hearing History
Judge: 4-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT
EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT
EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT | |
| 02-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT | |
| 03-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Surendranagar Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque worth ₹16,00,000. The court found all required ingredients proven: the cheque was drawn on a valid bank account for debt discharge, presented within validity, dishonored due to insufficient funds, proper notice issued, and payment failed within 15 days. The accused was sentenced to 6 months imprisonment, ₹25,000 fine, and ordered to compensate the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Surendranagar Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque worth ₹16,00,000. The court found all required ingredients proven: the cheque was drawn on a valid bank account for debt discharge, presented within validity, dishonored due to insufficient funds, proper notice issued, and payment failed within 15 days. The accused was sentenced to 6 months imprisonment, ₹25,000 fine, and ordered to compensate the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts