BIMAL PRADIPBHAI GOSALIYA vs SHANTA SHOP INDUSTRIES Advocate - P K MAKWANA — 961/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 06th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSN020012652024
Filing Number
961/2024
Filing Date
22-Mar-2024
Registration No
961/2024
Registration Date
22-Mar-2024
Court
CIVIL COURT SURENDRANAGAR
Judge
9-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Last updated 15-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BIMAL PRADIPBHAI GOSALIYA
Adv. A R SOLANKI
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHANTA SHOP INDUSTRIES Advocate - P K MAKWANA
-
2.SHANTA SHOP INDUSTRIES AUTHORIZED SIGNATURY HARDIK JITENDRABHAI VORA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Surendranagar Additional District Judge convicted the defendants (Shanta Shop Industries and its authorized signatory Jitendrabhai Vora) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring two cheques worth ₹2,00,000 that were issued to settle a debt obligation. The court found that the complainant had proven all essential elements of the offense, including that cheques were issued for a legally enforceable debt, presented within validity period, dishonored due to drawer signature mismatch, and that statutory notice was served but payment was not made within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Jan-2026
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Dec-2025
Restored
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Nov-2025
JudegementView PDF
-
10-Nov-2025
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Sep-2025
Final Arguments
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Aug-2025
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Aug-2025
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jul-2025
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jun-2025
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
27-May-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
05-May-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
16-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
03-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
06-Mar-2025
For Compromise
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
10-Feb-2025
For Compromise
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
09-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Complainant
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
09-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Complainant
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
11-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Complainant
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
23-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Complainant
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
09-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Complainant
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
10-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Complainant
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
28-Aug-2024
Process To Accused
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
14-Aug-2024
Process To Accused
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
26-Jul-2024
Process To Accused
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
09-Jul-2024
Process To Accused
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
13-Jun-2024
Process To Accused
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
17-May-2024
Process To Accused
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 961/2024
Court Decision Summary The Surendranagar Additional District Judge convicted the defendants (Shanta Shop Industries and its authorized signatory Jitendrabhai Vora) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring two cheques worth ₹2,00,000 that were issued to settle a debt obligation. The court found that the complainant had proven all essential elements of the offense, including that cheques were issued for a legally enforceable debt, presented within validity period, dishonored due to drawer signature mismatch, and that statutory notice was served but payment was not made within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts