BIMAL PRADIPBHAI GOSALIYA vs SHANTA SHOP INDUSTRIES Advocate - P K MAKWANA — 961/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 06th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSN020012652024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
961/2024
Filing Date
22-03-2024
Registration No
961/2024
Registration Date
22-03-2024
Court
CIVIL COURT SURENDRANAGAR
Judge
9-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BIMAL PRADIPBHAI GOSALIYA
Adv. A R SOLANKI
Respondent(s)
SHANTA SHOP INDUSTRIES Advocate - P K MAKWANA
SHANTA SHOP INDUSTRIES AUTHORIZED SIGNATURY HARDIK JITENDRABHAI VORA
Hearing History
Judge: 9-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 28-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 24-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 13-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 04-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Surendranagar Additional District Judge convicted the defendants (Shanta Shop Industries and its authorized signatory Jitendrabhai Vora) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring two cheques worth ₹2,00,000 that were issued to settle a debt obligation. The court found that the complainant had proven all essential elements of the offense, including that cheques were issued for a legally enforceable debt, presented within validity period, dishonored due to drawer signature mismatch, and that statutory notice was served but payment was not made within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Surendranagar Additional District Judge convicted the defendants (Shanta Shop Industries and its authorized signatory Jitendrabhai Vora) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring two cheques worth ₹2,00,000 that were issued to settle a debt obligation. The court found that the complainant had proven all essential elements of the offense, including that cheques were issued for a legally enforceable debt, presented within validity period, dishonored due to drawer signature mismatch, and that statutory notice was served but payment was not made within 15 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts