STATE OF GUJARAT vs DALPATBHAI GHEMARBHAI RABARI Advocate - S B VAGHELA — 2382/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65 AA,81,98. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSK050030352025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2382/2025

Filing Date

15-12-2025

Registration No

2382/2025

Registration Date

15-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDBRAHMA

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

0810

Police Station

KHEDBRAHMA POLICE STATION - SABARKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65 AA,81,98

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

DALPATBHAI GHEMARBHAI RABARI Advocate - S B VAGHELA

BIJALRAM MHADEVARAM RABARI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

13-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

05-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

27-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

22-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Khedbrahma acquitted two defendants (Dalpat Bhai Gamerba Rabari and Bijal Ram Mahadev Ram Rabari) charged under the Prohibition Act, Sections 65(A,A), 81, and 98, for alleged illegal possession of foreign alcohol and a moped. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, particularly because the independent witnesses (Panchas) did not corroborate the police's allegations, and the search procedure's integrity was questionable. The court applied the principle from *State vs Raijibhai Chaturbhai Solanki* that conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony when Pancha presence was mandatory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Khedbrahma acquitted two defendants (Dalpat Bhai Gamerba Rabari and Bijal Ram Mahadev Ram Rabari) charged under the Prohibition Act, Sections 65(A,A), 81, and 98, for alleged illegal possession of foreign alcohol and a moped. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, particularly because the independent witnesses (Panchas) did not corroborate the police's allegations, and the search procedure's integrity was questionable. The court applied the principle from *State vs Raijibhai Chaturbhai Solanki* that conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony when Pancha presence was mandatory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDBRAHMA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case