STATE OF GUJARAT vs DALPATBHAI GHEMARBHAI RABARI Advocate - S B VAGHELA — 2382/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65 AA,81,98. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSK050030352025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2382/2025
Filing Date
15-12-2025
Registration No
2382/2025
Registration Date
15-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDBRAHMA
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
0810
Police Station
KHEDBRAHMA POLICE STATION - SABARKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DALPATBHAI GHEMARBHAI RABARI Advocate - S B VAGHELA
BIJALRAM MHADEVARAM RABARI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 05-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 27-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 22-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Khedbrahma acquitted two defendants (Dalpat Bhai Gamerba Rabari and Bijal Ram Mahadev Ram Rabari) charged under the Prohibition Act, Sections 65(A,A), 81, and 98, for alleged illegal possession of foreign alcohol and a moped. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, particularly because the independent witnesses (Panchas) did not corroborate the police's allegations, and the search procedure's integrity was questionable. The court applied the principle from *State vs Raijibhai Chaturbhai Solanki* that conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony when Pancha presence was mandatory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Khedbrahma acquitted two defendants (Dalpat Bhai Gamerba Rabari and Bijal Ram Mahadev Ram Rabari) charged under the Prohibition Act, Sections 65(A,A), 81, and 98, for alleged illegal possession of foreign alcohol and a moped. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, particularly because the independent witnesses (Panchas) did not corroborate the police's allegations, and the search procedure's integrity was questionable. The court applied the principle from *State vs Raijibhai Chaturbhai Solanki* that conviction cannot rest solely on uncorroborated police testimony when Pancha presence was mandatory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts