YUNUSBHAI BASUBHAI PATHAN vs ANVARSHA MAHMADSHA FAKIR — 2989/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSK040035762022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2989/2022
Filing Date
01-12-2022
Registration No
2989/2022
Registration Date
01-12-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, IDAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
YUNUSBHAI BASUBHAI PATHAN
Adv. P A GURJAR
Respondent(s)
ANVARSHA MAHMADSHA FAKIR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
For Evidence of Complainant
For Evidence of Complainant
For Evidence of Complainant
For Evidence of Complainant
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-04-2026 | For Evidence of Complainant | |
| 07-03-2026 | For Evidence of Complainant | |
| 16-01-2026 | For Evidence of Complainant | |
| 05-12-2025 | For Evidence of Complainant |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the accused, Anvarsha Mahamdsha Fakir, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of ₹1,50,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The complainant had loaned this amount to the accused for business purposes, and after the cheque was dishonored, proper notice was served but the accused failed to make payment within 15 days. The court sentenced the accused to one year simple imprisonment and ordered him to pay compensation of ₹1,50,000 to the complainant, with an additional two months imprisonment if compensation is not paid within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court convicted the accused, Anvarsha Mahamdsha Fakir, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of ₹1,50,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The complainant had loaned this amount to the accused for business purposes, and after the cheque was dishonored, proper notice was served but the accused failed to make payment within 15 days. The court sentenced the accused to one year simple imprisonment and ordered him to pay compensation of ₹1,50,000 to the complainant, with an additional two months imprisonment if compensation is not paid within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts