YUNUSBHAI BASUBHAI PATHAN vs ANVARSHA MAHMADSHA FAKIR — 2989/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSK040035762022

Filing Number

2989/2022

Filing Date

01-Dec-2022

Registration No

2989/2022

Registration Date

01-Dec-2022

Court

TALUKA COURT, IDAR

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YUNUSBHAI BASUBHAI PATHAN

    Adv. P A GURJAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANVARSHA MAHMADSHA FAKIR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court convicted the accused, Anvarsha Mahamdsha Fakir, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of ₹1,50,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The complainant had loaned this amount to the accused for business purposes, and after the cheque was dishonored, proper notice was served but the accused failed to make payment within 15 days. The court sentenced the accused to one year simple imprisonment and ordered him to pay compensation of ₹1,50,000 to the complainant, with an additional two months imprisonment if compensation is not paid within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    For Evidence of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 05-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 18-Oct-2025

    For Evidence of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 04-Sep-2025

    For Evidence of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 31-Jul-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 13-Jun-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 03-May-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 28-Mar-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 10-Feb-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 26-Dec-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 21-Nov-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 20-Sep-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 25-Jul-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 17-May-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  20. 15-Mar-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  21. 25-Jan-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  22. 07-Dec-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  23. 05-Oct-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  24. 22-Aug-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  25. 03-Jul-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  26. 08-May-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  27. 31-Mar-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  28. 17-Feb-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  29. 10-Jan-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  30. 29-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 01-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2989/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused, Anvarsha Mahamdsha Fakir, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of ₹1,50,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The complainant had loaned this amount to the accused for business purposes, and after the cheque was dishonored, proper notice was served but the accused failed to make payment within 15 days. The court sentenced the accused to one year simple imprisonment and ordered him to pay compensation of ₹1,50,000 to the complainant, with an additional two months imprisonment if compensation is not paid within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case