DHANJIBHAI KALUBHAI VASANI vs SARFARAJ SABIR ANSARI Advocate - S N RAMANUJ — 6/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ270000092025

Filing Number

6/2025

Filing Date

10-Jan-2025

Registration No

6/2025

Registration Date

10-Jan-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, VINCHHIYA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHANJIBHAI KALUBHAI VASANI

    Adv. B R Rathod

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SARFARAJ SABIR ANSARI Advocate - S N RAMANUJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    SUMMARY The court convicted the accused Sarfara Sabir Ansari under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act for issuing a cheque of Rs. 1,00,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds, which was issued as security for a debt. The complainant established that he lent money to the accused based on a notarized promissory note with a specified repayment period, and the accused failed to repay despite receiving a legal notice. The court sentenced the accused to six months simple imprisonment and ordered compensation of Rs. 1,00,000 to be paid to the complainant within 60 days, with an additional three months imprisonment if the amount is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 06-May-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 12-Jan-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 15-Dec-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 11-Nov-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 28-Oct-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 30-Sep-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 01-Sep-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 11-Aug-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 22-Jul-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 08-Jul-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 26-Jun-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 17-Jun-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 02-Jun-2025

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 19-May-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 05-May-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 15-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 18-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 03-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 10-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 10-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2025

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The court convicted the accused Sarfara Sabir Ansari under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act for issuing a cheque of Rs. 1,00,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds, which was issued as security for a debt. The complainant established that he lent money to the accused based on a notarized promissory note with a specified repayment period, and the accused failed to repay despite receiving a legal notice. The court sentenced the accused to six months simple imprisonment and ordered compensation of Rs. 1,00,000 to be paid to the complainant within 60 days, with an additional three months imprisonment if the amount is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case