DHANJIBHAI KALUBHAI VASANI vs SARFARAJ SABIR ANSARI Advocate - S N RAMANUJ — 6/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 14th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ270000092025
Filing Number
6/2025
Filing Date
10-01-2025
Registration No
6/2025
Registration Date
10-01-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VINCHHIYA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DHANJIBHAI KALUBHAI VASANI
Adv. B R Rathod
Respondent(s)
SARFARAJ SABIR ANSARI Advocate - S N RAMANUJ
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 22-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 02-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 11-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY The court convicted the accused Sarfara Sabir Ansari under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act for issuing a cheque of Rs. 1,00,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds, which was issued as security for a debt. The complainant established that he lent money to the accused based on a notarized promissory note with a specified repayment period, and the accused failed to repay despite receiving a legal notice. The court sentenced the accused to six months simple imprisonment and ordered compensation of Rs. 1,00,000 to be paid to the complainant within 60 days, with an additional three months imprisonment if the amount is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The court convicted the accused Sarfara Sabir Ansari under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act for issuing a cheque of Rs. 1,00,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds, which was issued as security for a debt. The complainant established that he lent money to the accused based on a notarized promissory note with a specified repayment period, and the accused failed to repay despite receiving a legal notice. The court sentenced the accused to six months simple imprisonment and ordered compensation of Rs. 1,00,000 to be paid to the complainant within 60 days, with an additional three months imprisonment if the amount is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts