THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs NAVINBHAI @ NAVALBHAI RAMESHBHAI JETHVA Advocate - M B PARMAR — 56/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJRJ190010512022
Filing Number
56/2022
Filing Date
13-10-2022
Registration No
56/2022
Registration Date
13-10-2022
Court
FTC COURT, GONDAL
Judge
5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
15
Police Station
GONDAL TALUKA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
NAVINBHAI @ NAVALBHAI RAMESHBHAI JETHVA Advocate - M B PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 5-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 25-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 21-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 18-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Gondal acquitted accused Navnitbhai Jethva of charges under IPC Section 307 (attempt to murder) and GP Act Section 135 (illegal weapons), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony, lack of corroboration from eyewitnesses, and insufficient evidence linking the accused to the alleged weapon, warranting acquittal with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Gondal acquitted accused Navnitbhai Jethva of charges under IPC Section 307 (attempt to murder) and GP Act Section 135 (illegal weapons), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony, lack of corroboration from eyewitnesses, and insufficient evidence linking the accused to the alleged weapon, warranting acquittal with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts