SAURASHTRA EMPLOYEES UNION vs BSNL, SURENDRANAGAR Advocate - G K BHATT — 79/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 18th April 2026.
REF ITC - REFERENCE (I.T.C.)
CNR: GJRJ160001402025
Filing Number
79/2025
Filing Date
18-01-2003
Registration No
79/2025
Registration Date
18-01-2003
Court
INDUSTRIAL COURT, RAJKOT
Judge
1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAURASHTRA EMPLOYEES UNION
Adv. B B GOGIA
Respondent(s)
BSNL, SURENDRANAGAR Advocate - G K BHATT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT
Disposed
For Order
For Order
For Evidence of first party
For Evidence of first party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | For Order |
| 11-03-2026 | For Order |
| 03-03-2026 | For Evidence of first party |
| 12-02-2026 | For Evidence of first party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Judgment Summary The Industrial Court at Rajkot found that Rathod Dineshchandra Popatlal's termination from his casual labor position at the Telecom Department (now BSNL) in 1988 was illegal, as the employer failed to comply with mandatory retrenchment procedures under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act. However, given that the applicant has since reached superannuation age and the dispute was decided 38 years later, the court awarded Rs. 2,00,000 as lump-sum compensation instead of reinstatement and back-wages, with interest at 7.5% per annum if unpaid within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Judgment Summary The Industrial Court at Rajkot found that Rathod Dineshchandra Popatlal's termination from his casual labor position at the Telecom Department (now BSNL) in 1988 was illegal, as the employer failed to comply with mandatory retrenchment procedures under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act. However, given that the applicant has since reached superannuation age and the dispute was decided 38 years later, the court awarded Rs. 2,00,000 as lump-sum compensation instead of reinstatement and back-wages, with interest at 7.5% per annum if unpaid within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts