SAURASHTRA EMPLOYEES UNION vs BSNL, SURENDRANAGAR Advocate - G K BHATT — 79/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 18th April 2026.

REF ITC - REFERENCE (I.T.C.)

CNR: GJRJ160001402025

Case disposed

Filing Number

79/2025

Filing Date

18-01-2003

Registration No

79/2025

Registration Date

18-01-2003

Court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, RAJKOT

Judge

1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT

Decision Date

18th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10

Petitioner(s)

SAURASHTRA EMPLOYEES UNION

Adv. B B GOGIA

Respondent(s)

BSNL, SURENDRANAGAR Advocate - G K BHATT

Hearing History

Judge: 1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT

18-04-2026

Disposed

08-04-2026

For Order

11-03-2026

For Order

03-03-2026

For Evidence of first party

12-02-2026

For Evidence of first party

Final Orders / Judgements

18-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT
18-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Judgment Summary The Industrial Court at Rajkot found that Rathod Dineshchandra Popatlal's termination from his casual labor position at the Telecom Department (now BSNL) in 1988 was illegal, as the employer failed to comply with mandatory retrenchment procedures under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act. However, given that the applicant has since reached superannuation age and the dispute was decided 38 years later, the court awarded Rs. 2,00,000 as lump-sum compensation instead of reinstatement and back-wages, with interest at 7.5% per annum if unpaid within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Judgment Summary The Industrial Court at Rajkot found that Rathod Dineshchandra Popatlal's termination from his casual labor position at the Telecom Department (now BSNL) in 1988 was illegal, as the employer failed to comply with mandatory retrenchment procedures under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act. However, given that the applicant has since reached superannuation age and the dispute was decided 38 years later, the court awarded Rs. 2,00,000 as lump-sum compensation instead of reinstatement and back-wages, with interest at 7.5% per annum if unpaid within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

INDUSTRIAL COURT, RAJKOT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case