THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ANILBHAI KANUBHAI RAJPARA Advocate - V V HATVANI — 585/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ140006652023

Filing Number

585/2023

Filing Date

24-Mar-2023

Registration No

585/2023

Registration Date

24-Mar-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, JASDAN

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213005220228

Police Station

BHADLA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANILBHAI KANUBHAI RAJPARA Advocate - V V HATVANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Rajkot Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Case CC No. 585 of 2023 acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 504, and the Gujarat Police Act Section 135. The court found that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient credible evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused the injury with a hatchet. The testimony of witnesses contradicted key facts, documentary evidence was lacking, and the medical evidence did not definitively establish the accused's involvement, leading to the defendant's acquittal based on the presumption of innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 30-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 07-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 03-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 03-May-2025

    Restored

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 15-Jun-2023

    OrderView PDF

  21. 15-Jun-2023

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 14-Jun-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 22-May-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 27-Apr-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 24-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 585/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Rajkot Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Case CC No. 585 of 2023 acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 504, and the Gujarat Police Act Section 135. The court found that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient credible evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused the injury with a hatchet. The testimony of witnesses contradicted key facts, documentary evidence was lacking, and the medical evidence did not definitively establish the accused's involvement, leading to the defendant's acquittal based on the presumption of innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case