THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ANILBHAI KANUBHAI RAJPARA Advocate - V V HATVANI — 585/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 25th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ140006652023
Filing Number
585/2023
Filing Date
24-03-2023
Registration No
585/2023
Registration Date
24-03-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, JASDAN
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213005220228
Police Station
BHADLA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ANILBHAI KANUBHAI RAJPARA Advocate - V V HATVANI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 16-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 11-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Rajkot Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Case CC No. 585 of 2023 acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 504, and the Gujarat Police Act Section 135. The court found that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient credible evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused the injury with a hatchet. The testimony of witnesses contradicted key facts, documentary evidence was lacking, and the medical evidence did not definitively establish the accused's involvement, leading to the defendant's acquittal based on the presumption of innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Rajkot Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Case CC No. 585 of 2023 acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 504, and the Gujarat Police Act Section 135. The court found that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient credible evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused the injury with a hatchet. The testimony of witnesses contradicted key facts, documentary evidence was lacking, and the medical evidence did not definitively establish the accused's involvement, leading to the defendant's acquittal based on the presumption of innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts