THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DHANJIBHAI VIRJIBHAI DUMADIYA Advocate - R N SHETH — 92/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,324. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ140001032022
Filing Number
92/2022
Filing Date
07-Jan-2022
Registration No
92/2022
Registration Date
07-Jan-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, JASDAN
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213021200270
Police Station
JASDAN POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.DHANJIBHAI VIRJIBHAI DUMADIYA Advocate - R N SHETH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, and 135 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the essential ingredients of the case beyond reasonable doubt, as witness testimonies contained contradictions and lacked corroborating documentary evidence to prove the alleged assault with injuries on the complainant's head and body. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Jan-2026
Restored
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Mar-2022
OrderView PDF
-
23-Mar-2022
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Feb-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jan-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 92/2022
Case Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, and 135 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the essential ingredients of the case beyond reasonable doubt, as witness testimonies contained contradictions and lacked corroborating documentary evidence to prove the alleged assault with injuries on the complainant's head and body. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts