THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAGHUBHA TAPUBHA SARVAIYA Advocate - R A SOJITRA — 529/2025

JudegementView PDF

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court of Jamkandorna acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) due to insufficient corroborating evidence and procedural defects in the investigation. The court found that prosecution witnesses (panchas/village elders) failed to support the case, the investigation lacked independent witness documentation, and the accused's custody was based on contaminated procedures, rendering the conviction unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Disposed

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Framing Of Charge/Plea

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 529/2025