THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs JAYDIPSINH NARUBHA JADEJA Advocate - P R KOYANI — 522/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65F. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ080006622025

Case disposed

Filing Number

522/2025

Filing Date

16-12-2025

Registration No

522/2025

Registration Date

16-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, JAMKANDORNA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213020250472

Police Station

JAMKANDORANA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65F

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

JAYDIPSINH NARUBHA JADEJA Advocate - P R KOYANI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

02-04-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

11-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

27-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

13-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted the accused of illegal liquor manufacturing charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65(a) due to insufficient evidence and procedural defects in the investigation. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as witnesses (panchas) did not support the prosecution's narrative, and crucial evidence regarding seized materials lacked proper documentation and chain of custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused of illegal liquor manufacturing charges under Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 65(a) due to insufficient evidence and procedural defects in the investigation. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as witnesses (panchas) did not support the prosecution's narrative, and crucial evidence regarding seized materials lacked proper documentation and chain of custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, JAMKANDORNA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case