THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs GHANSHYAMSINH URFE GHANO MAHAVIRSINH VALA Advocate - R A SOJITRA — 142/2024
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E),116(B). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 25th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ080001682024
Filing Number
142/2024
Filing Date
03-Apr-2024
Registration No
142/2024
Registration Date
03-Apr-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, JAMKANDORNA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0013
Police Station
JAMKANDORANA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.GHANSHYAMSINH URFE GHANO MAHAVIRSINH VALA Advocate - R A SOJITRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Court Judgment Summary The court acquitted the accused, Ghanshyamsingh, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949 Section 65(e) and 116B, finding that the prosecution failed to establish a credible case due to lack of independent witness corroboration, procedural defects in the search and seizure, and absence of supporting evidence from the investigating officer's FSL report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jan-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Aug-2024
Framing Of Charge/Plea
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jul-2024
Framing Of Charge/Plea
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Jul-2024
Framing Of Charge/Plea
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Jul-2024
Framing Of Charge/Plea
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Jun-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 142/2024
Court Judgment Summary The court acquitted the accused, Ghanshyamsingh, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949 Section 65(e) and 116B, finding that the prosecution failed to establish a credible case due to lack of independent witness corroboration, procedural defects in the search and seizure, and absence of supporting evidence from the investigating officer's FSL report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts