PGVCL vs TIRTHRAJSINH HANUBHAI VALA Advocate - R K GAJERA — 42/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 35. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 30th March 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJRJ070018792024

Case disposed

Filing Number

42/2024

Filing Date

14-10-2024

Registration No

42/2024

Registration Date

14-10-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, UPLETA

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 35

Petitioner(s)

PGVCL

Adv. K R RANINGA

Respondent(s)

TIRTHRAJSINH HANUBHAI VALA Advocate - R K GAJERA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

30-03-2026

Disposed

27-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

25-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

24-03-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

20-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary of Court Decision The court dismissed the plaintiff's (Western Gujarat Power Company Limited) civil suit seeking recovery of ₹7,22,388-49 from the defendant for alleged electricity theft. The court ruled that under the Electricity Act, 2003, disputes regarding electricity theft and civil liability can only be determined by the Special Court (under Section 154(5)), not civil courts. Since no criminal complaint has been adjudicated by the Special Court establishing theft and fixing civil liability, the civil court lacks jurisdiction to entertain this recovery suit independently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Decision The court dismissed the plaintiff's (Western Gujarat Power Company Limited) civil suit seeking recovery of ₹7,22,388-49 from the defendant for alleged electricity theft. The court ruled that under the Electricity Act, 2003, disputes regarding electricity theft and civil liability can only be determined by the Special Court (under Section 154(5)), not civil courts. Since no criminal complaint has been adjudicated by the Special Court establishing theft and fixing civil liability, the civil court lacks jurisdiction to entertain this recovery suit independently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, UPLETA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case