GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT, GONDAL CITY P.S. vs JAGDISHBHAI LAXMANBHAI MAKVANA Advocate - N N SARVADI — 2015/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 332,186,504,506(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ040027152022
Filing Number
2015/2022
Filing Date
22-09-2022
Registration No
2015/2022
Registration Date
22-09-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, GONDAL
Judge
3-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213015220848
Police Station
GONDAL CITY POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT, GONDAL CITY P.S.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JAGDISHBHAI LAXMANBHAI MAKVANA Advocate - N N SARVADI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 15-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 23-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
JUDGMENT SUMMARY The court acquitted the accused, Jagdishbhai Lakshman Makwana, of charges under IPC Sections 332, 186, 504, and 506(2). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical procedural defects: the complaint did not comply with Section 195 CrPC (requiring written complaints for offenses against public servants), witness testimony lacked corroboration, and the evidence was insufficient to establish the alleged assault and intimidation of a jail officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
JUDGMENT SUMMARY The court acquitted the accused, Jagdishbhai Lakshman Makwana, of charges under IPC Sections 332, 186, 504, and 506(2). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical procedural defects: the complaint did not comply with Section 195 CrPC (requiring written complaints for offenses against public servants), witness testimony lacked corroboration, and the evidence was insufficient to establish the alleged assault and intimidation of a jail officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts