DIVYESHBHAI GIRDHARBHAI KALARIYA vs VIJENDAR PANWAR Advocate - V P SAGATHIYA — 886/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 22nd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ030009352023
Filing Number
886/2023
Filing Date
04-05-2023
Registration No
886/2023
Registration Date
04-05-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, KOTDA SANGANI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
22nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DIVYESHBHAI GIRDHARBHAI KALARIYA
Adv. P B GOSAI, V K SHETH
Respondent(s)
VIJENDAR PANWAR Advocate - V P SAGATHIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 17-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 17-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque that bounced due to insufficient funds. The defendant had issued three cheques totaling ₹12,33,700 to the complainant as payment for goods supplied, but the cheques were returned dishonored. The court found that the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption of consideration and issued a punishment of two years imprisonment and ordered compensation of ₹11,09,200 to be paid to the complainant within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque that bounced due to insufficient funds. The defendant had issued three cheques totaling ₹12,33,700 to the complainant as payment for goods supplied, but the cheques were returned dishonored. The court found that the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption of consideration and issued a punishment of two years imprisonment and ordered compensation of ₹11,09,200 to be paid to the complainant within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts