DIVYESHBHAI GIRDHARBHAI KALARIYA vs VIJENDAR PANWAR Advocate - V P SAGATHIYA — 886/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 22nd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ030009352023
Filing Number
886/2023
Filing Date
04-May-2023
Registration No
886/2023
Registration Date
04-May-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, KOTDA SANGANI
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
22-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Last updated 16-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DIVYESHBHAI GIRDHARBHAI KALARIYA
Adv. P B GOSAI, V K SHETH
Respondent(s)
-
1.VIJENDAR PANWAR Advocate - V P SAGATHIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque that bounced due to insufficient funds. The defendant had issued three cheques totaling ₹12,33,700 to the complainant as payment for goods supplied, but the cheques were returned dishonored. The court found that the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption of consideration and issued a punishment of two years imprisonment and ordered compensation of ₹11,09,200 to be paid to the complainant within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Feb-2026
OrderView PDF
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-May-2025
Evidence Of Defence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Defence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Jan-2025
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Dec-2024
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Dec-2024
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Nov-2024
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Sep-2024
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Sep-2024
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Aug-2024
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Jul-2024
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jun-2024
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Dec-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Oct-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Sep-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 886/2023
Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque that bounced due to insufficient funds. The defendant had issued three cheques totaling ₹12,33,700 to the complainant as payment for goods supplied, but the cheques were returned dishonored. The court found that the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption of consideration and issued a punishment of two years imprisonment and ordered compensation of ₹11,09,200 to be paid to the complainant within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts