DIVYESHBHAI GIRDHARBHAI KALARIYA vs VIJENDAR PANWAR Advocate - V P SAGATHIYA — 886/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ030009352023

Filing Number

886/2023

Filing Date

04-May-2023

Registration No

886/2023

Registration Date

04-May-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, KOTDA SANGANI

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DIVYESHBHAI GIRDHARBHAI KALARIYA

    Adv. P B GOSAI, V K SHETH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIJENDAR PANWAR Advocate - V P SAGATHIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque that bounced due to insufficient funds. The defendant had issued three cheques totaling ₹12,33,700 to the complainant as payment for goods supplied, but the cheques were returned dishonored. The court found that the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption of consideration and issued a punishment of two years imprisonment and ordered compensation of ₹11,09,200 to be paid to the complainant within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 02-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 18-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 14-May-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 16-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 05-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 01-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 01-Jan-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 18-Dec-2024

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 11-Dec-2024

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 13-Nov-2024

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 18-Sep-2024

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 11-Sep-2024

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 28-Aug-2024

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 24-Jul-2024

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 12-Jun-2024

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 15-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 13-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 07-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 20-Dec-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 25-Oct-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 20-Sep-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 05-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 04-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 886/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque that bounced due to insufficient funds. The defendant had issued three cheques totaling ₹12,33,700 to the complainant as payment for goods supplied, but the cheques were returned dishonored. The court found that the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption of consideration and issued a punishment of two years imprisonment and ordered compensation of ₹11,09,200 to be paid to the complainant within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case