SANJAYBHAI BHIKHABHAI SOJITRA vs GIRISHBHAI VALLABHBHAI KANSAGRA Advocate - C R KACHHADIYA — 23/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 22nd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJRJ030006352022
Filing Number
23/2022
Filing Date
29-04-2022
Registration No
23/2022
Registration Date
29-04-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, KOTDA SANGANI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
22nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANJAYBHAI BHIKHABHAI SOJITRA
Adv. R A SHUKLA, P B GOSAI
Respondent(s)
GIRISHBHAI VALLABHBHAI KANSAGRA Advocate - C R KACHHADIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 21-02-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
| 03-02-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Gujarat High Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for outstanding construction payment of ₹2,74,999.75 against the defendant, finding that the plaintiff failed to complete the construction work as per the December 2019 contract and did not provide adequate evidence of completed work through completion certificates or expert assessments. The court determined that the defendant's obligation to make payment was conditional on full completion of the construction, which was not satisfactorily proven by the plaintiff's testimony and photographic evidence alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Gujarat High Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for outstanding construction payment of ₹2,74,999.75 against the defendant, finding that the plaintiff failed to complete the construction work as per the December 2019 contract and did not provide adequate evidence of completed work through completion certificates or expert assessments. The court determined that the defendant's obligation to make payment was conditional on full completion of the construction, which was not satisfactorily proven by the plaintiff's testimony and photographic evidence alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts