HEIR OF VIRABHAI RAMABHAI SOLANKI , RAMESHBHAI VIRABHAI SOLANKI vs SOMABHAI KANABHAI SOLANKI Advocate - S M VEKARIYA — 42/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 31. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 18th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJRJ030004252025
Filing Number
42/2025
Filing Date
22-04-2025
Registration No
42/2025
Registration Date
22-04-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KOTDA SANGANI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HEIR OF VIRABHAI RAMABHAI SOLANKI , RAMESHBHAI VIRABHAI SOLANKI
Adv. A H JOSHI
Respondent(s)
SOMABHAI KANABHAI SOLANKI Advocate - S M VEKARIYA
MONGHIBEN SOMABHAI SOLANKI
Adv. S M VEKARIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 24-02-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 06-02-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 13-01-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The Gujarat High Court rejected the plaintiff's suit claiming land allocated to his father in 1970 as "shamlat" (joint village property), dismissing it under the Limitation Act. The court held that the suit was barred by limitation (27 years had passed since the 1998 sale deed), lacked proper pleadings regarding the ancestral property claim, and failed to establish a valid cause of action with material particulars as required by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Summary The Gujarat High Court rejected the plaintiff's suit claiming land allocated to his father in 1970 as "shamlat" (joint village property), dismissing it under the Limitation Act. The court held that the suit was barred by limitation (27 years had passed since the 1998 sale deed), lacked proper pleadings regarding the ancestral property claim, and failed to establish a valid cause of action with material particulars as required by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts