Government of Gujarat vs JIVANBHAI RAMBHAI AANKOLIYA Advocate - R N SHETH — 184/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 08th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ030002052024
Filing Number
184/2024
Filing Date
13-02-2024
Registration No
184/2024
Registration Date
13-02-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, KOTDA SANGANI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213026230346
Police Station
KOTDA SANGANI POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JIVANBHAI RAMBHAI AANKOLIYA Advocate - R N SHETH
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 20-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 18-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court emphasized that the burden of proof lies solely on the prosecution, and the accused's defense—that no fraudulent transaction or breach of trust occurred—could not be contradicted by the prosecution's evidence. Consequently, the accused was ordered to be released, and land valued at ₹10,000 was directed to be returned to the accused within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Section 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court emphasized that the burden of proof lies solely on the prosecution, and the accused's defense—that no fraudulent transaction or breach of trust occurred—could not be contradicted by the prosecution's evidence. Consequently, the accused was ordered to be released, and land valued at ₹10,000 was directed to be returned to the accused within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts