Government of Gujarat vs THAKOR VALSANGJI ABHUJI Advocate - G K PANCHAL — 60/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366,376(2)(N). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th April 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJPT010025532024
Filing Number
60/2024
Filing Date
10-Oct-2024
Registration No
60/2024
Registration Date
10-Oct-2024
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT PATAN
Judge
4-2nd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11217026240317
Police Station
PATAN TALUKA POLICE STATION - PATAN DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. J J BAROT
Respondent(s)
-
1.THAKOR VALSANGJI ABHUJI Advocate - G K PANCHAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Court's Decision The Patan Special Judge (POCSO) acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n) and POCSO Act Sections 3(a), 4, 5(l), 6, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged offense. The court noted contradictions in the victim's testimony, conflicting statements about her birth date, and lack of corroborating documentary evidence (school certificates/board records), while noting evidence suggesting the victim was in a consensual relationship with the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl District Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
3rd Addl District Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
3rd Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Further Statement
3rd Addl District Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
15-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
31-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
19-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
01-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
17-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
03-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
30-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
16-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
02-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
12-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
29-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
24-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
03-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
20-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2025
Framing Of Charge
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2025
Framing Of Charge
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2025
Framing Of Charge
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
30-Jan-2025
Framing Of Charge
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
22-Jan-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
10-Jan-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
02-Jan-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
19-Dec-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
05-Dec-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
21-Nov-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
07-Nov-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
24-Oct-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
17-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 60/2024
Summary of Court's Decision The Patan Special Judge (POCSO) acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n) and POCSO Act Sections 3(a), 4, 5(l), 6, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged offense. The court noted contradictions in the victim's testimony, conflicting statements about her birth date, and lack of corroborating documentary evidence (school certificates/board records), while noting evidence suggesting the victim was in a consensual relationship with the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts