STATE OF GUJARAT vs SUNILBHAI RAJUBHAI NAYAK Advocate - D R SOLANKI — 32/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)(M),64(2)(I),69. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 04th June 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJPM170011742025
Filing Number
32/2025
Filing Date
13-Aug-2025
Registration No
32/2025
Registration Date
13-Aug-2025
Court
ADDL. DIST. COURT HALOL
Judge
1-Addl.district & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
04-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
447
Police Station
HALOL TOWN POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. AGP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUNILBHAI RAJUBHAI NAYAK Advocate - D R SOLANKI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Jun-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Sunilbhai Rajubhai Nayak (Special POCSO Case 32/2025) The Special POCSO Court at Halol acquitted 21-year-old Sunilbhai Rajubhai Nayak of all charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and POCSO Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove abduction or sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt. Though the victim was confirmed to be a minor (17 years 8 months), the court determined she voluntarily accompanied the accused in a consensual love affair without any inducement or force, and no physical relationship was established by medical evidence or the victim's own testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jun-2026
Disposed
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
03-Jun-2026
Further Statement
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
02-Jun-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
15-May-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
14-May-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
13-May-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
08-May-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
06-May-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
13-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
01-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
27-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
16-Sep-2025
Copies To Accused
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
04-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 32/2025
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Sunilbhai Rajubhai Nayak (Special POCSO Case 32/2025) The Special POCSO Court at Halol acquitted 21-year-old Sunilbhai Rajubhai Nayak of all charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and POCSO Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove abduction or sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt. Though the victim was confirmed to be a minor (17 years 8 months), the court determined she voluntarily accompanied the accused in a consensual love affair without any inducement or force, and no physical relationship was established by medical evidence or the victim's own testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts