STATE OF GUJARAT vs SUNILBHAI RAJUBHAI NAYAK Advocate - D R SOLANKI — 32/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)(M),64(2)(I),69. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 04th June 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJPM170011742025
Filing Number
32/2025
Filing Date
13-08-2025
Registration No
32/2025
Registration Date
13-08-2025
Court
ADDL. DIST. COURT HALOL
Judge
1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
04th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
447
Police Station
HALOL TOWN POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. AGP
Respondent(s)
SUNILBHAI RAJUBHAI NAYAK Advocate - D R SOLANKI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 03-06-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 02-06-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 15-05-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 14-05-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Sunilbhai Rajubhai Nayak (Special POCSO Case 32/2025) The Special POCSO Court at Halol acquitted 21-year-old Sunilbhai Rajubhai Nayak of all charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and POCSO Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove abduction or sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt. Though the victim was confirmed to be a minor (17 years 8 months), the court determined she voluntarily accompanied the accused in a consensual love affair without any inducement or force, and no physical relationship was established by medical evidence or the victim's own testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Sunilbhai Rajubhai Nayak (Special POCSO Case 32/2025) The Special POCSO Court at Halol acquitted 21-year-old Sunilbhai Rajubhai Nayak of all charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and POCSO Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove abduction or sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt. Though the victim was confirmed to be a minor (17 years 8 months), the court determined she voluntarily accompanied the accused in a consensual love affair without any inducement or force, and no physical relationship was established by medical evidence or the victim's own testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts