SALMAN AHEMADHUSEN BHOLA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 91/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - S

CNR: GJPM170003032026

Filing Number

91/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

91/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

ADDL. DIST. COURT HALOL

Judge

2-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 10-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SALMAN AHEMADHUSEN BHOLA

    Adv. S A SAIYED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Third Additional Sessions Court, Halol granted regular bail to the accused under the Indian Penal Code Section 325 and Gujarat Animal Preservation Act 2017 Section 8(2), 8(4), and 10. The court held that merely filing a charge-sheet does not constitute a change of circumstances to deny bail, and since the investigation was complete with sufficient evidence already gathered, the accused's continued custody was not justified. The court ordered the accused released on bail with conditions, noting that the allegations of cattle slaughter were substantiated by the charge-sheet but did not warrant continued judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Order

    3rd Addl District Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Order

    3rd Addl District Judge

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 91/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Third Additional Sessions Court, Halol granted regular bail to the accused under the Indian Penal Code Section 325 and Gujarat Animal Preservation Act 2017 Section 8(2), 8(4), and 10. The court held that merely filing a charge-sheet does not constitute a change of circumstances to deny bail, and since the investigation was complete with sufficient evidence already gathered, the accused's continued custody was not justified. The court ordered the accused released on bail with conditions, noting that the allegations of cattle slaughter were substantiated by the charge-sheet but did not warrant continued judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case