SALMAN AHEMADHUSEN BHOLA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 91/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - S

CNR: GJPM170003032026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

91/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

91/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Court

ADDL. DIST. COURT HALOL

Judge

2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,

Petitioner(s)

SALMAN AHEMADHUSEN BHOLA

Adv. S A SAIYED

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP

Hearing History

Judge: 2-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

09-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

ORDER

02-03-2026

ORDER

27-02-2026

REPLY OF I.O.

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Third Additional Sessions Court, Halol granted regular bail to the accused under the Indian Penal Code Section 325 and Gujarat Animal Preservation Act 2017 Section 8(2), 8(4), and 10. The court held that merely filing a charge-sheet does not constitute a change of circumstances to deny bail, and since the investigation was complete with sufficient evidence already gathered, the accused's continued custody was not justified. The court ordered the accused released on bail with conditions, noting that the allegations of cattle slaughter were substantiated by the charge-sheet but did not warrant continued judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Third Additional Sessions Court, Halol granted regular bail to the accused under the Indian Penal Code Section 325 and Gujarat Animal Preservation Act 2017 Section 8(2), 8(4), and 10. The court held that merely filing a charge-sheet does not constitute a change of circumstances to deny bail, and since the investigation was complete with sufficient evidence already gathered, the accused's continued custody was not justified. The court ordered the accused released on bail with conditions, noting that the allegations of cattle slaughter were substantiated by the charge-sheet but did not warrant continued judicial custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL. DIST. COURT HALOL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case