STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRADEEPBHAI SABURBHAI BARIA Advocate - N U PARMAR — 8/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)(I),64(2)(M). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 22nd May 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJPM170002892026
Filing Number
8/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
ADDL. DIST. COURT HALOL
Judge
1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
22nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
587
Police Station
DAMAVAV POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHAL DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. AGP
Respondent(s)
PRADEEPBHAI SABURBHAI BARIA Advocate - N U PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 20-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 19-05-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 18-05-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 8/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge & Special Judge (POCSO) at Halol acquitted the accused, Pradipbhai Saburbhai Baria, of all charges on 22 May 2026, finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Finding: The court determined this was a consensual relationship between a 16-year-old girl and the accused. The victim voluntarily went to the accused's house and stayed there. The FIR was lodged only after settlement negotiations failed when the accused's family refused to pay ₹70,000 as demanded during a community "Davo Bhangvo" (bride-price settlement), revealing the case was motivated by extortion rather than genuine criminal complaint. Critical Evidence: The victim herself admitted in cross-examination that the accused did not molest or rape her, that she had a 3-year love relationship with him, and that he never abducted her from parental custody. Medical examination found no evidence of sexual assault (negative UPT test, no semen found, no injury marks). The court found the FIR's oblique motive cast serious doubts on the prosecution's credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 8/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge & Special Judge (POCSO) at Halol acquitted the accused, Pradipbhai Saburbhai Baria, of all charges on 22 May 2026, finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Finding: The court determined this was a consensual relationship between a 16-year-old girl and the accused. The victim voluntarily went to the accused's house and stayed there. The FIR was lodged only after settlement negotiations failed when the accused's family refused to pay ₹70,000 as demanded during a community "Davo Bhangvo" (bride-price settlement), revealing the case was motivated by extortion rather than genuine criminal complaint. Critical Evidence: The victim herself admitted in cross-examination that the accused did not molest or rape her, that she had a 3-year love relationship with him, and that he never abducted her from parental custody. Medical examination found no evidence of sexual assault (negative UPT test, no semen found, no injury marks). The court found the FIR's oblique motive cast serious doubts on the prosecution's credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts