GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs RAVINDARA KUMAR SHANTILAL SOLANKI Advocate - J M DINDOR — 219/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85, 661B. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJPM050002942025

Case disposed

Filing Number

219/2025

Filing Date

24-02-2025

Registration No

219/2025

Registration Date

24-02-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, SHEHERA

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

FIR Details

FIR Number

851

Police Station

SHAHERA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 85, 661B

Petitioner(s)

GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAVINDARA KUMAR SHANTILAL SOLANKI Advocate - J M DINDOR

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PLEA

13-02-2026

PLEA

16-01-2026

PLEA

13-12-2025

PLEA

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Ravindara Kumar Shantilal Solanki Case No.: 219/2025 Court Decision: The court discharged the accused under Section 85 of the Gujarat Police Act (drunk and disorderly behavior charge), finding insufficient prima facie evidence. Although the FIR alleged general misconduct (quarreling, abusive language, indecent behavior), the police complaint and chargesheet lacked specific, concrete particulars demonstrating the accused's conduct as prescribed under Section 85—namely, that the accused was drunk and created a nuisance, quarreled, used foul language, fought, or misbehaved with a woman in a public place. The court held that mere suspicion unsupported by clear factual details in the record was insufficient to frame charges, applying the settled legal principle that a trial judge must exercise judicial discretion to determine whether sufficient prima facie evidence exists before proceeding to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Ravindara Kumar Shantilal Solanki Case No.: 219/2025 Court Decision: The court discharged the accused under Section 85 of the Gujarat Police Act (drunk and disorderly behavior charge), finding insufficient prima facie evidence. Although the FIR alleged general misconduct (quarreling, abusive language, indecent behavior), the police complaint and chargesheet lacked specific, concrete particulars demonstrating the accused's conduct as prescribed under Section 85—namely, that the accused was drunk and created a nuisance, quarreled, used foul language, fought, or misbehaved with a woman in a public place. The court held that mere suspicion unsupported by clear factual details in the record was insufficient to frame charges, applying the settled legal principle that a trial judge must exercise judicial discretion to determine whether sufficient prima facie evidence exists before proceeding to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SHEHERA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case