GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs RAVINDARA KUMAR SHANTILAL SOLANKI Advocate - J M DINDOR — 219/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85, 661B. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJPM050002942025
Filing Number
219/2025
Filing Date
24-02-2025
Registration No
219/2025
Registration Date
24-02-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, SHEHERA
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
FIR Details
FIR Number
851
Police Station
SHAHERA POLICE STATION - PANCHMAHALS DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAVINDARA KUMAR SHANTILAL SOLANKI Advocate - J M DINDOR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PLEA
PLEA
PLEA
PLEA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PLEA |
| 13-02-2026 | PLEA |
| 16-01-2026 | PLEA |
| 13-12-2025 | PLEA |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Ravindara Kumar Shantilal Solanki Case No.: 219/2025 Court Decision: The court discharged the accused under Section 85 of the Gujarat Police Act (drunk and disorderly behavior charge), finding insufficient prima facie evidence. Although the FIR alleged general misconduct (quarreling, abusive language, indecent behavior), the police complaint and chargesheet lacked specific, concrete particulars demonstrating the accused's conduct as prescribed under Section 85—namely, that the accused was drunk and created a nuisance, quarreled, used foul language, fought, or misbehaved with a woman in a public place. The court held that mere suspicion unsupported by clear factual details in the record was insufficient to frame charges, applying the settled legal principle that a trial judge must exercise judicial discretion to determine whether sufficient prima facie evidence exists before proceeding to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Ravindara Kumar Shantilal Solanki Case No.: 219/2025 Court Decision: The court discharged the accused under Section 85 of the Gujarat Police Act (drunk and disorderly behavior charge), finding insufficient prima facie evidence. Although the FIR alleged general misconduct (quarreling, abusive language, indecent behavior), the police complaint and chargesheet lacked specific, concrete particulars demonstrating the accused's conduct as prescribed under Section 85—namely, that the accused was drunk and created a nuisance, quarreled, used foul language, fought, or misbehaved with a woman in a public place. The court held that mere suspicion unsupported by clear factual details in the record was insufficient to frame charges, applying the settled legal principle that a trial judge must exercise judicial discretion to determine whether sufficient prima facie evidence exists before proceeding to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts