HEIRS OF DECEASED RAYJIBHAI MALABHAI PARMAR 1. SURYABEN W/O RAYJIBHAI MALABHAI PARMAR vs ANANDIBEN W/O RAYJIBHAI MALABHAI Advocate - K D MALEK — 97/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 22,34,39. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJPM040035632024
Filing Number
97/2024
Filing Date
24-Sep-2024
Registration No
97/2024
Registration Date
24-Sep-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALOL
Judge
3-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Last updated 10-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HEIRS OF DECEASED RAYJIBHAI MALABHAI PARMAR 1. SURYABEN W/O RAYJIBHAI MALABHAI PARMAR
Adv. J P PARMAR
-
2.BALDEVBHAI RAYJIBHAI MALABHAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANANDIBEN W/O RAYJIBHAI MALABHAI Advocate - K D MALEK
-
2.SURESHBHAI RAYJIBHAI PARMAR
Adv. K D MALEK
-
3.HEIRS OF DECEASED BHARATBHAI RAYJIBHAI PARMAR(Legal Heir)
-
4.PARVATIBEN D/O RAYJIBHAI MALABHAI PARMAR W/O GOPALSINH AMARSINH GOHIL
Adv. K D MALEK
-
5.MANHARBHAI RAYJIBHAI PARMAR
Adv. K D MALEK
-
6.ANOPBHAI JALABHAI PARMAR
-
7.RUKHIBEN SHABHAIBHAI PARMAR
-
8.PANKAJBHAI MOTIBHAI PARMAR
-
9.LAXMIBEN D/O SOMABHAI JALAMBHAI
-
10.GANPATBHAI SOMABHAI PARMAR
-
11.MANIBEN D/O SOMABHAI JALAMBHAI PARMAR
Case History
-
09-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
03-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
22-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
15-Sep-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary Case R.C.S. No. 97/2024 - Order Dated 15 September 2025 The court rejected the plaintiffs' petition for a mandatory injunction and suit for partition of joint property. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish that they are legal heirs of Rajhiba Malhabai Parmar or entitled to a 1/4 share of the disputed lands. The defendants' counter-arguments were upheld, noting no evidence of cultivation or occupancy by plaintiffs on the property in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Aug-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
14-Jul-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Jun-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
19-Apr-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
13-Mar-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
07-Feb-2025
Summons - Notice
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
23-Jan-2025
Summons - Notice
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
19-Dec-2024
Summons - Notice
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
30-Nov-2024
Summons - Notice
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Oct-2024
Summons - Notice
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 97/2024
Summary Case R.C.S. No. 97/2024 - Order Dated 15 September 2025 The court rejected the plaintiffs' petition for a mandatory injunction and suit for partition of joint property. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish that they are legal heirs of Rajhiba Malhabai Parmar or entitled to a 1/4 share of the disputed lands. The defendants' counter-arguments were upheld, noting no evidence of cultivation or occupancy by plaintiffs on the property in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts