HEIRS OF DECEASED RAYJIBHAI MALABHAI PARMAR 1. SURYABEN W/O RAYJIBHAI MALABHAI PARMAR vs ANANDIBEN W/O RAYJIBHAI MALABHAI Advocate - K D MALEK — 97/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 22,34,39,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJPM040035632024
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
97/2024
Filing Date
24-09-2024
Registration No
97/2024
Registration Date
24-09-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, HALOL
Judge
3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HEIRS OF DECEASED RAYJIBHAI MALABHAI PARMAR 1. SURYABEN W/O RAYJIBHAI MALABHAI PARMAR
Adv. J P PARMAR
BALDEVBHAI RAYJIBHAI MALABHAI
Respondent(s)
ANANDIBEN W/O RAYJIBHAI MALABHAI Advocate - K D MALEK
SURESHBHAI RAYJIBHAI PARMAR
Adv. K D MALEK
HEIRS OF DECEASED BHARATBHAI RAYJIBHAI PARMAR(Legal Heir)
PARVATIBEN D/O RAYJIBHAI MALABHAI PARMAR W/O GOPALSINH AMARSINH GOHIL
Adv. K D MALEK
MANHARBHAI RAYJIBHAI PARMAR
Adv. K D MALEK
ANOPBHAI JALABHAI PARMAR
RUKHIBEN SHABHAIBHAI PARMAR
PANKAJBHAI MOTIBHAI PARMAR
LAXMIBEN D/O SOMABHAI JALAMBHAI
GANPATBHAI SOMABHAI PARMAR
MANIBEN D/O SOMABHAI JALAMBHAI PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 03-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 22-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 09-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 10-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary Case R.C.S. No. 97/2024 - Order Dated 15 September 2025 The court rejected the plaintiffs' petition for a mandatory injunction and suit for partition of joint property. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish that they are legal heirs of Rajhiba Malhabai Parmar or entitled to a 1/4 share of the disputed lands. The defendants' counter-arguments were upheld, noting no evidence of cultivation or occupancy by plaintiffs on the property in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Case R.C.S. No. 97/2024 - Order Dated 15 September 2025 The court rejected the plaintiffs' petition for a mandatory injunction and suit for partition of joint property. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish that they are legal heirs of Rajhiba Malhabai Parmar or entitled to a 1/4 share of the disputed lands. The defendants' counter-arguments were upheld, noting no evidence of cultivation or occupancy by plaintiffs on the property in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts